• fracture [he/him] @beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    it’s crazy how those comments are aging like milk precisely because google/web search is going to shit (in addition to being dickhead comments ofc)

    just weird to look back and think about how we thought it would never change

    • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      To give google 1(one) droplet of credit, the enshittification didn’t come from them alone. In fact I’m fairly sure that if they could get their way, the page would still return useful results, only, JUST below all the paid ads. SEO Spam doesn’t help THEM either.

      The problem is… A lot of the “good” results on google came from like. Enthusiast websites. Webforums. And… Reddit.

      Enthusiast Websites are much rarer now. They got consolidated into media conglomerates and then closed down. Only a few remain.

      Webforums are in a similar zombified state, most got vored by “social media” and Discord (P.S.: if you are a dev or artist or whatever and use a Discord server as the main helpline/download source for a project you’re doing, fuck you very much, you are the ACTUAL worst <3), which aren’t indexed by search engines.

      Then Reddit got Spez’d, so THAT avenue is fucked too.

      Fedi isn’t indexed by search engines either (AFAIK), so you can’t do the old “<Search terms> reddit” trick replacing reddit with lemmy. It won’t work.

      • fracture [he/him] @beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        a friend of mine discovered the tip to add “before:2025” (or, the current year+1) to your yt search to improve it. i have no clue why that does anything but it reverts it to pre-enshittified functionality

  • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I FOUND A STACK OVERFLOW QUESTIONS RECENTLY THAT WAS LITERALLY THIS!

    Nr. 1 accepted answer (lots of years ago): something something plenty of information available on Google, no need for this thread

    Nr. 2 answer (way fewer years ago): seeing as this is now the first Google result for anything relating to this, here’s how you do it.

    (shame I can’t remember what exactly the question was. Please still me? 🥺)

    • sparkle@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      Cymraeg
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      (shame I can’t remember what exactly the question was. Please still me? 🥺)

      I think about half the threads on stackoverflow fit this criteria

  • erp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    It may be pronounced goople.fart, but it’s spelled goople.farht.

    I’ll see myself aus.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      “But why do you want that?” should be an automatic time-out on most Q&A sites. Especially anything technical.

      I don’t need to convince you to make my decisions.

      • rumschlumpel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        A lot of the time, the fundamental issue is the lack of information provided by the poster. I’ve seen so many threads where the provided information just isn’t enough, and they don’t react to any of the questions at all.

    • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      “You shouldn’t do [y] either, you idiot, you absolute fucking buffoon. You should instead do [z, which costs a fortune and/or requires you to restructure your entire life]”

  • ceiphas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Here is a comprehensive Guide how to do [x]:

    {20 paragraphs of Background Story}

    [x] is Impossible to do, you dumbfuck

    • brisk@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Oh god you reminded me of this gem

      https://serverfault.com/questions/780150/how-to-cache-contents-in-haproxy#780155

      Someone asks how to do http caching in HAproxy.

      The one answer:

      don’t use the wrong tool

      haproxy is a wonderful tool. It does not provide caching. A quick scan of the fine docs can verify this. Unless you want to patch haproxy you need to use a tool that does what you’re looking to do.

      don’t create impossible problems

      By asking for haproxy to do something that it doesn’t and excluding the tool that seems to do what you want to do you’ve create an impossible situation. There is no technical solution for this. Don’t make choices that box you into a corner.

      try varnish or anything that actually caches

      If you get over that you might find this tutorial on using varnish with haproxy useful or try varnish by itself. Maybe squid or memcached would be more your speed.

      In the comments to this ludicrous tirade we get this simple comment:

      This was true and valid back then. Nowadays HAProxy does this.

      And just in case someone found this looking for an answer, here’s the example from that link

      backend bck1
        mode http
      
        http-request cache-use foobar
        http-response cache-store foobar
        server srv1 127.0.0.1:80
      
      cache foobar
        total-max-size 4
        max-age 240
      
  • Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    goes to goople
    searches ‘1980 cx500 only runs on one cylinder’
    comment from 2007: “replace this module right here:”
    [broken Photobucket link]

  • Jentu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    And when you finally find some helpful forum with content from 15 years ago, you’ll have someone be like “GUYS I FIGURED IT OUT! Here’s a [broken] link to someone else who solved it” with a dozen or so “Thanks, that solved the issue immediately for me!” Comments after it.

  • Thrife@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Nevermind, have figured it out.

    <thread closed with NO FUCKING ASWER kthxbye>

    • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Described: Why whenever I figure something out myself after posting a help thread, I’ll write a whole report on what I did before it got fixed (because often I’m just throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks, and I never know what exactly moved the needle)

      • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Those threads with “fixed it!” and no instructions? If they’re on reddit, I’m posting “I deleted system32 and the problem went away!”

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            sudo rm -rf /

            Ok, so I retroactively removed the realm of France and now a bunch of Spanish people are pissed about living too close to Luxembourg and the number of great cheeses in the world has decreased by 80%!

            What now?

    • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Like I said in a previous thread that ended up on this topic. There’s a special place in hell, with Satan from Little Nicky, a few pineapples and some lobsters to hang off these asshole’s nipples…

  • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Literally happens all the damn time anymore

    Whole first page is ads and threads of people saying, ‘Just Google it,’ ‘There’s a search function here for a reason,’ ‘thread locked due to frequently asked question,’ etc, etc.

    I miss the earlier days of the Internet where people were more helpful. Or hell when Google wasn’t just ads and SEO crap.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      My sweet summer child, issues with google search existed in 2008, things just accelerated at a massive rate once it became the de facto standard and people figured out how to manipulate search results.

    • ted@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I hate that shit. People answer with “check page 72 of your car manual” and it’s like … you clearly pulled out the manual to pull that page number, I’m under my car right now, just copy the damned sentence.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    It was even wrose when there was a site by the name “let me google it for you”, which insulted you while made an animation about how to use this “not evil” website google. You google “how to do [X]” find a nice looking forum, and people either are angry that OP didn’t google it, or they deceptively linked to a lmgify page.

    After a month of suffering, I instead reinstalled Windows XP, which I had a lot of trouble with (fugly UI, stability issues, performance issues, etc), but not as much as with the “king of stability”, Linux.

    • Raxiel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I always used to use “Let me bing it for you” at least then it was probably something they hadn’t tried, and it was proper trolling instead of just being passive aggressive