• n2burns@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    In your previous comment, you were equating “Danger” to “Death Rates.” How often do you hear of a cyclist dying in an incident that doesn’t involve a car?

    Yes, accidents and injuries happen. I’ve literally fallen while walking twice in the past week.

    My ex-wife broke her pelvis when she got hit by another cyclist.

    And if that was a car, do you think she would have survived?

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      In your previous comment, you were equating “Danger” to “Death Rates.” How often do you hear of a cyclist dying in an incident that doesn’t involve a car?

      First: you said, and I quote, “Riding a bicycle itself isn’t all that dangerous, even without a helmet.”. That is blatantly, proveably false, especially when you say that it’s not dangerous even without a helmet. I’ve broken multiple helmet in multiple single-bicycle accidents over the 20-odd years that I was commuting regularly by bicycle; at least one of those would have very likely have been fatal without a helmet.

      How many cyclists die outside of interactions with cars? In 2001, 44% of fatal bicycle accidents–377 out of 853–did not involve being hit by, or hitting, a car. So, there ya go. Damn near half of cycling fatalities aren’t involving motor vehicles. (The site mentions them as being bicycle transportation fatalities, which seems to exclude bicycle recreation fatalities, but I can’t guarantee that they aren’t including deaths from mountain biking. Per the same source, helmets appear to reduce the risk of brain trauma by about 60%.)

      And if that was a car, do you think she would have survived?

      If she had been in a car, and hit by another car? Yes, I think she would have been fine. Cars have airbags, set belts, and crumple zones. If she’d been hit by a car, while on a bicycle? Can’t say. Statistically? Yes.

      • n2burns@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        You seem to be having trouble with reading comprehension. Maybe you need to read things more thoroughly? I’ll try to provide some clarification.

        First: you said, and I quote, “Riding a bicycle itself isn’t all that dangerous, even without a helmet.”. That is blatantly, proveably false, especially when you say that it’s not dangerous even without a helmet.

        I didn’t say it’s “not dangerous”, I said it “isn’t all dangerous”, which implies there is some danger.

        In 2001, 44% of fatal bicycle accidents–377 out of 853–did not involve being hit by, or hitting, a car[1].

        That’s not what your source says. “Of the 1,230 bicyclist deaths in 2021, 853 died in motor-vehicle crashes and 377 in other incidents,” is what it says, so that 30% that weren’t in a direct motor-vehicle crash. Even then, how many were indirectly caused by motor-vehicles? If a bicycle veers out of the way of a car, that’s counted as an “other incident”. Speed is one of the most dangerous aspects of bicycles and you feel to cycle faster when riding with traffic. Even you previous noted many incidents which are poor infrastructure or maintenance issues.

        If she had been in a car, and hit by another car? Yes, I think she would have been fine.

        That’s the point…cars are dangerous to people not in cars.