Kyle Rittenhouse abruptly departed the stage during an appearance at the University of Memphis on Wednesday, after he was confronted about comments made by Turning Point USA founder and president Charlie Kirk.

Rittenhouse was invited by the college’s Turning Point USA chapter to speak at the campus. However, the event was met with backlash from a number of students who objected to Rittenhouse’s presence.

The 21-year-old gained notoriety in August 2020 when, at the age of 17, he shot and killed two men—Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26, as well as injuring 26-year-old Gaige Grosskreutz—at a protest in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

He said the three shootings, carried out with a semi-automatic AR-15-style firearm, were in self-defense. The Black Lives Matter (BLM) protest where the shootings took place was held after Jacob Blake, a Black man, was left paralyzed from the waist down after he was shot by a white police officer.

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah, but the shots were in self defence, even though he shouldn’t have been there

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          So back to my comment:
          He can go there, with his gun, to potentially take lives to protect property.
          This is because the protestors are not allowed to damage property to protect lives.

          • ZK686@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            WTF are you smoking? The dudes ATTACKED HIM FIRST… damn man…seems like you guys just insist on ignoring the facts.

    • ZK686@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yea, but you’re on Redd…I mean, Lemmy… so, the looters, arsonists and burglars get a pass…

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Right, because property is more important than people.

        Your only way of disparaging these people is “they were damaging property!” Which last I checked did not carry the death sentence.
        Put them in front of a jury and a death sentence would be monstrous, put them in front of a vigilante and “they had it coming for stealing!”

        • ZK686@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          “Property is more important than people” is a phrase being thrown around by the Left to try and make the Rittenhouse situation into something it isn’t. He didn’t go there to kill anyone. He went there to help defend stores, like 1000’s of others did throughout the country (remember during the LA riots, Koreans sitting on top of their stores with guns? Were they horrible because they cared about their belongings?). He was attacked by some low lives who fucked around and found out.