President Joe Biden is arguing that “there is something dangerous happening in America” as he revives his warnings that Donald Trump and his allies represent an existential threat to the country’s democratic institutions.

There is an extremist movement that does not share the basic beliefs of our democracy. The MAGA movement,” Biden says in excerpts of the speech Thursday in Arizona, released in advance by the White House, referring Trump’s Make America Great Again slogan.

Although voting in the 2024 Republican primary doesn’t begin for months, Biden’s focus reflects Trump’s status as the undisputed frontrunner for his party’s nomination despite facing four indictments, two of them related to his attempts to overturn Biden’s victory in the 2020 election.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      A party that’s socially suppresses the people does not represent the people. I say this about capitalism and leninism both. The party should only answer to the people. Not the other way round.

      Like the farmers that under threat of the party. We’re forced to listen to the lunatic ramblings of Trofim Lysenko. Discarding what they knew would work to follow his unfounded recommendations. Exacerbating famines in Russia China Etc killing Millions. Committees and councils are absolutely bad about inaction. But inaction on genocide and torture I’ll take that any day.

        • Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nice deflection. There was Global famine happening. Yes it happened before. His policies specifically pushed by the party militantly exacerbated and killed Millions more people than would have otherwise died. But you can’t face that fact. This is what I talk about no ability to be rational or self critique.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            How was there a global famine happening if communism only emerged in one country at that point? Doesn’t that strike you as odd?

            Or are you one of those ultra left “everyone except for my sooper speshul ideology is bad!”?

            • Eldritch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              How was there a global famine happening if communism only emerged in one country at that point? Doesn’t that strike you as odd?

              No. Because that’s a non sequitur claim that I never made.

              Or are you one of those ultra left “everyone except for my sooper speshul ideology is bad!”?

              No not at all. I can work with liberals and other right Wingers of their ilk. I disagree with them highly. But can work with it. It’s the authoritarians and those who selfishly enable authoritarians for their own benefits that I don’t get along with.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                No. Because that’s a non sequitur claim that I never made.

                You definitely implied it by blaming communism in Russia for famine, when the famine itself was global.

                No not at all. I can work with liberals and other right Wingers of their ilk. I disagree with them highly.

                Okay, so you don’t really care about human suffering or death (or else the immense amounts of both under liberalism would bother you) You just don’t like being told what to do.

                • Eldritch@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You definitely implied it by blaming communism in Russia for famine, when the famine itself was global.

                  To quote what I said exactly

                  His policies specifically pushed by the party militantly exacerbated and killed Millions more people than would have otherwise died.

                  Is it that English isn’t your primary language? Lack of reading comprehension? Or is it just your inability as a Leninist to honestly accept genuine critique?

                  Okay, so you don’t really care about human suffering or death (or else the immense amounts of both under liberalism would bother you) You just don’t like being told what to do.

                  You quoted exactly what I said and then blatantly completely misrepresented it. To be honest I’m completely unsurprised. This is what we can expect from a leninist. Also you do realize that your critique against liberals is equally valid against you as a leninist and the Nations who have adopted your ideology. Two wrongs don’t make right. However there is a distinct difference here. There are liberals who in general are not authoritarian. There are not however non authoritarian leninists. It is the core differentiator of your ideology from standard Marxism.

                  I’m fine with deferring to expertise and following instructions. However unlike yourself I am not a slave devoted to a single static ideology. And unable to think for myself. I am fine with a national government after a fashion. I think there should be a much more even distribution of power and tight restrictions on it. But I think that for instance one perfect example of an issue that needs to be addressed at a national level. Should be guaranteeing human rights. However I don’t believe that level of government has any right restricting anything outside of protecting those guarantees. Something that yes liberals have issues with. Though not to the same extent as leninists.

                  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Is it that English isn’t your primary language? Lack of reading comprehension? Or is it just your inability as a Leninist to honestly accept genuine critique?

                    lol what the fuck

                    Okay, so like, I was trying to point out the fact that famine being widespread means that the underlying cause is bigger than politics and ideology. No one knew what the fuck they were doing. There isn’t some fatal flaw of Leninism that causes famine and is somehow unique to Leninism, that’s just how agriculture was before scientific understanding advanced to the point that we could truly industrialize the agricultural industry.

                    You quoted exactly what I said and then blatantly completely misrepresented it. To be honest I’m completely unsurprised. This is what we can expect from a leninist. Also you do realize that your critique against liberals is equally valid against you as a leninist and the Nations who have adopted your ideology. Two wrongs don’t make right. However there is a distinct difference here.

                    I literally said I also think anarchists have good ideas, I wouldn’t consider myself pure M-L or anything. Back off lol

                    There are liberals who in general are not authoritarian.

                    lol

                    I’m fine with deferring to expertise and following instructions. However unlike yourself I am not a slave devoted to a single static ideology.

                    And what is to be done when there aren’t any experts? When all the instructions you have to follow are folk wisdom and superstition? That’s what the USSR was dealing with back then. Again, no one knew what the fuck they were doing. They weren’t special. That’s just how the world was.

                    And as we speak and without any centralized ideology the agricultural industry is destroying our world; emitting carbon and methane, polluting our drinking water, incubating new diseases, causing oceanic dead zones, inducing metabolic diseases like diabetes and obesity, deforesting and destroying habitat, on and on it goes.

                    How do you solve that without authority to crack down and force people to stop chopping down the Amazon and stop keeping pigs in tiny cages filled with shit?