• ipodjockey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    If both candidates are morally reprehensible and the political elite refuse to give the voters better options. Then revolution and overthrow of the government is the only ethical course of action available.

    I think you are describing a path of political damage control, but I am of the opinion that the political parties are two sides of the same right-wing coin. A vote for either results in our rights being stripped away to benefit the wealthy class. It’s just a matter of speed and approach. Also, there is an argument to be made that minorities are already living under severe state oppression and to uphold the system as is only benefits the white majority.

    At some point I have to pull the moral rip cord and stop participating in a immoral system as much as possible. Otherwise I am just an enabler.

    I think there is better way to run human society and I don’t think the American Republic as is has a path towards that.

    I think we might be the bad guys…

    • aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Apathy/“checking out” is an intended consequence of amped-up propaganda. In Russia, it’s deployed so the “ruling elite” have even less oversight.

      To make things better, you have to help steer - saying you’re not going to participate unless everything is perfect nullifies your impact.

      And, to be sure, “burning it down” will almost certainly not result in things aligning to your moral stance - opportunistic, evil actors thrive in chaos.