• AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    If you really want the job, this is a bad idea. The form is there so that HR (who usually knows nothing about the technical details of the posted jobs) can match base requirements against what the hiring manager is looking for. If they get a match, they just forward the resume to the manager. Doing stuff like this on the form is likely going to result in them just moving on without looking at your application further. And it doesn’t mean it’s a bad place to work; the company and the manager might be great.

    • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Also, it’s hard for a computer to parse a resume, and most of this stuff runs through a computer before a human sees it, so filling a form makes sure the data is correct.

      You also don’t have to worry about corrupted or unsupported files.

      • 800XL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        You’re telling me that computers are sophisticated enough to drive cars and create new antibiotics but resumes are just too much? Nah.

        If that’s the case then don’t ask for a resume and only have the form to input job history that can be easily handed over to a manager using a printable template.

        It’s lazy on HR’s part and on the HR software they use.

  • beebers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    As a hiring manager, I am absolutely floored how many people do not actually have this information on their resumes. So while most people would assume a lot of redundancies between the form and a resume, I can assure you that many people do not have this information readily available on their resumes.

    • Chocrates@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Why do you need to build a system to capture this information from people that can’t read rather than just rejecting those applications?

      • Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Thousands of applications and only dozens of jobs.

        Imagine a world where there are countless open job reqs and only one applicant per job. That might be the case if the world population was not 8 billion.

        • Chocrates@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m saying why not just reject them if you have lots of applicants… Not sure I follow what you are saying.

          Building the elaborate system to help them get last the initial pass of resumes only gives you more resumes to look at later.

          • Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I honestly think ATS are a pain in the ass simply to filter out the people who won’t deal with bullshit. They want people who will live with bullshit working for them because the org is (always) dysfunctional.

            Alternatively… their HR technology team is just trash because it’s run by HR and not someone who knows technology. Seen it plenty of times where shadow IT is being run by people who don’t know what they’re doing beyond “we need this thing.”

            • Chocrates@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              I just joined a fantastic team and within a month I saw how dysfunctional it is. Nobody knows how to organize humans. Whoever actually figures it out could rule the world.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Would actually love to do that. I just have an extreme aversion to knowingly shooting myself in the foot