• jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    The insanity here in the US is intense. The other day a coworker was trying to say health care in Europe is worse “because you have to wait”. No nuance or acknowledgement that in the US you often have to wait AND pay.

    • JDubbleu@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Healthcare in the US is amazing IF you have amazing insurance. Unfortunately that’s the exception so it’s absolute dog shit for most people.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        My peer group mostly had good insurance and we still have a lot of stories about being dicked around by it. The dysfunction here isn’t just the cost, but also the stress and overhead of dealing with it. Plus the occasional “insurance is denying my claim for bs reasons”.

  • Haagel@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’ve got a friend from Uruguay who lives in Finland (very similar standard of living compared with Norway) and who recently visited me in America. I can confirm that this article is not satire. He was absolutely shocked to see the amount of homelessness and poverty in New York city and he tried very hard not to talk about the rock-solid financial security available to every citizen in Finland.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      The famous science fiction author Robert Heinlein wanted to tour the world with his wife Virginia. They had no interest in the northern hemisphere, they wanted to see the southern half.

      Everywhere they went Robert wanted to get eyeballs on the economy, see what was really going on. He would always ask the cab drivers to take him to the worst part of town, where the poorest of the poor lived.

      In Uruguay the driver took him to a modest neighborhood. The houses were very tiny, but well built, well taken care of. Flower beds out front, all that. Heinlein was a bit upset.

      “I clearly asked you to take me to the poorest neighborhoods.”

      “Oh no senior! These are the poorest people! They are on government welfare and are very ashamed to live like this.”

      That was in the 80’s. Imagine that.

    • Kage520@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      My third great grandfather left there and came to the US. WHAT WAS HE THINKING!? lol

      • Crampon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        It was a great idea at the time. Lots of Norwegians left to search for a better future for themselves and their families.

        There’s actually more descendents from that generation on the USA than in Norway today. They truly prospered in the US compared to Norway.

        • Poiar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Somehow I doubt these numbers.

          Regardless, does “prospering” mean “had a lot of offspring” in your mind? Not to say that I don’t think they led a better life than their Norwegian counter parts at the time, it’s just a really odd phrasing to me

          • Crampon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            the numbers.

            some history in Norwegian. With more numbers.

            200 years ago it was beneficial to leave the country for many. The emigration had a big impact on Norway at the time. We are lucky to live in a nice periode now. But this periode has only lasted about 70 years. Its a really short time for a state. We have been an independent state for only 119 years after we got separated from Sweden in 1905.

  • Crampon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Sadly our politicians are slowly privatizing public services and making public services worse.

    Police and medical services are getting reduced on a yearly basis.

    We are selling our independence to the EU by letting other markets control the price of our electricity. Starting new industries relying on cheap electricity was a unique feature for us. We are making aluminium in small towns far away from large cities. Starting new plant will not be possible in the future.

    Corruption and nepotism between politicians and industries are being exposed more often than before.

    It’s nice living in Norway. But our politicians and capitalists have decided that this should come to an end. Norway’s peak has been reached.

    The race to the bottom has begun years ago.

    • Evotech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      You could also say that they are instead together with the rest of Europe. United. There’s no reason Norway would have super cheap power and Germany should struggle even more without Russian gas.

      • Crampon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I disagree.

        Germany dismantled their electric infrastructure by shutting down their nuclear plants. Only because boomers were afraid of hot metal in a pool. They replaced the green energy with coal and gas.

        Most of Europe use gas for heating and cooking. In Norway we use electricity for those purposes. It’s also very cold in most parts during the winter. So cheap electricity is a vital part of our infrastructure.

        Transporting electricity from Norway to Germany and GB is not efficient as there is a loss of power on the grid to heat during transport.

        France is a great opposite to Germany in this discussion. They are invested in their nuclear energy and has an export industry. France was the biggest exporter of electricity in Europe before Capitalists sold out the Norwegian people for some fat paychecks.

        • narp@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Germany didn’t “dismantle” their infrastructure, its mistake was to rely on cheap russian gas and shutting down their PV industry while they were ahead of China.

          The unanticipated war increased the prices and while it would have been great to still have the nuclear plants, they were really old already anyways.

          Nuclear energy is way too expensive, because it can only exist while being heavily subsidized. On top of that they are a big risk in combination with climate change. You mentioned France, but forgot the fact that they had to shut down their reactors due to drought in 2022 and had to import electricity for the first time in decades. Not really a technology that I would count on for the future, especially considering the long time it takes to build them.

          As you can see, shit happens and the idea in Europe is to stick together. I’m glad to be part of this. You sound like you’re angry and want to vote for politicians that don’t “sell you out to Europe”, I can imagine which kind of party that might be, good luck with that.

          • Crampon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Way to go attacking me at the end there.

            The electrical grid needs a balanced energy. When everyone now goes apeshit on wind because of the subsidies we basically fuck ourselves over big time. When it stops blowing in Germany it doesn’t blow in Norway. Most of the wind is generated by high pressure on the Atlantic and low pressure over Europe. The most common wind direction is from the ocean.

            Huge oil companies goes all in on wind. Can you guess why? When it doesn’t blow we have to burn gas.

            As of not selling us out to Europe. Guess which country has the most healthy fishing industry? You’re god damn right. We don’t want EU’s short sighted policies bankrupt us. EU countries are queuing up to fish us dry as they fished their own waters dry.

            Labeling me as some kind of extremist because I want to conserve the climate and environment is pretty rad.

            • narp@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              You’re making some strong claims, while using an even stronger language:

              • The “race to the button” has begun because of corrupt politicians and “Capitalists”, who sold out the Norwegian people for some “fat paychecks”.

              • Germany “dismantled” their electric infrastructure, because of “boomers”, that are afraid of “hot metal in a pool”, generally everyone who is against nuclear is “just afraid of what they don’t understand”.

              • Oil companies invest in wind energy, to keep people relying on oil in the future.

              • The EU wants to fish Norway dry.

              I already said my part about nuclear energy.

              That wind energy is an oil company conspiracy to keep people hooked on oil and not a diversification of their portfolio, similar to what Saudi Arabia is doing, I’m not going into much either.

              Norway, the EU and GB came to an agreement, that also benefits Norway, some quotes:

              This traditional deal between the two parties has been particularly demanding this year, as the quotas traditionally fished by Norwegian vessels are now located in the British zone, outside the territory of the European Union.

              Norwegian fishermen can now fish the opportunities Norway has acquired from Greenland, including shrimp, Greenland halibut, and redfish, and in the EU zone, such as roundnose grenadier.

              “It is gratifying that we have reached an agreement with the EU and the UK. This means that we have agreed on quotas for important stocks that we manage together in the North Sea. This is crucial for sustainable management,” concluded Minister of Fisheries and Oceans Cecilie Myrseth.

              Maybe if you dial your tone down a bit and add some sources to your claims, you could be taken more serious.

              • Crampon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                You can live in this fantasy where Norway is without faults and a perfect Paradise as much as you want

                I don’t care.

                Anything happening in the UK and the US is happening in Norway. Just a little bit later. NPM is an unstoppable force at the moment.

                People are getting shafted by inflation right now, wages are stagnant and the rich are exporting their wealth to Swiss for tax evasion. Birth rates are down and gang violence is in the rise. The Police force are getting it’s back broken with reforms.

                Housing is soon unavailable for the upcoming generation without well funded parents.

                This Christmas the organizations providing gifts and food for the poor had record numbers of people queuing up.

                But hey. Look at this nice street in Stavanger.

                Living in Norway is nice. But the welfare state and stable foundation for a trustworthy political system is under huge stress. People should’t form their opinion of a country based of social media posts.

                You can browse the Norwegian subreddit if you want to know what’s moving behind the facade. Norway has good freedom of the press, so follow Norwegian news outlet as well. Even the state media covers scandals.

        • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Dismantling the nuclear plants was the correct decision. Why produce radioactive trash you cannot safely store? The mistake was selling out solar tech. Funny you use france as a positive example because their power plants are in terrible conditions.

          • Crampon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            We have been safely storing nuclear “trash” for decades. Much of it isn’t really considered trash as it will have potential for new energy in the future. Temporary storage is more correct.

            France are planning to build six new plants.

            Nuclear energy has potential for catastrophes sure. But annual deaths by nuclear disasters Vs. Any other energy sources is pretty funny.

            Wind power is considered more lethal than nuclear.

            People are just afraid of what they don’t understand.