You must log in or register to comment.
Could it be some sort of meta joke where the reviewer is mocking how the paper is written by imitating its bad writing style?
I bet it’s a form with multiple entries, each entry is not different enough of the other ones:
How is the subject of this paper ?
What about the style ?
You checked to reject it, why should it be rejected ?
What’s the overall comment ?Then it’s all concatenated into one blob of review.
Not to mention it is poorly written.
… not forgetting that it’s poorly laid out.
…and let’s not forget also poorly written
