If this isn’t a targetted advert in my browser, I don’t know what is.

And here’s where you turn it off:

  • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    like all you have to do is turn off the option in settings; you can even add it to your policies.json to end it everywhere.

    • filcuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yeah like is anyone paying for Firefox? The only reason is still exist are the sponsors. Hell, one of the biggest by far was (is?) Google.

      • steelplatedmech@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I would be happy to pay them for brave origin equivalent of a stripped down Firefox without the sponsorships. Could use forks or disable stuff but I’m not against paying them for it to support them if that is something they offered.

        • filcuk@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          That is fair, though I think it would be a tough pill to swallow for most people, and Firefox is neither leading the charts nor do they have any significant advantage over the competition in web browsing to roll out a bold move like this.
          It’s a tough position. I do use it and hope they make it (*remain in business), just for the sake of competition.

          • 0x0@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Id happily pay for firefox without their ai bullshit

            I also pay for winrar, with a yearly subscription on android, even though im not using it anymore.

            And you should too.

  • Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    If this isn’t a targetted advert in my browser, I don’t know what is.

    Somewhere, a dastardly Mozilla engineer is cursing you out for figuring it out, even though they specifically labeled it ‘Sponsored’ as a double-bluff.

    • dou9m@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      23 hours ago

      It’s crazy that you think this was the engineers’ idea and not someone like the marketing director using their corporate capital to force the dev team to implement it… like pretty much every other company

    • monotremata@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The phrasing that shows in my version on mobile is now “support Firefox with occasional sponsored suggestions,” to try the guilt angle as well.

  • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Thanks for making me aware that there was yet another bullshit “feature” I needed to disable.

    • arak@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Yeah, i gave up self managing the adware and went to the Firefox fork, LibreWolf

        • arak@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          been running it for a year, not bad, had to just allow webgl coz so many sites won’t load properly without it

          • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            That’s good news as far as I’m concerned. I’ve got WebGL disabled in Firefox now. Frankly, if a website needs direct access to my GPU to run, I don’t need that website.

            What does add-on support look like? The baseline privacy looks (very) good, but I think I’d still like things like umatrix to block unnecessary or unwanted resource requests and to prevent running any extraneous javascript etc. An ad-blocker like ublock origin goes without saying. I refuse to access the WWW without one.

            If that ever becomes impossible, I’ll switch to Gemini exclusively :)

            • arak@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              i think it’s mostly the same as firefox for extensions, i have UBO, improve youtube, Twitchtv adblock, allow rightclick

              • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                13 hours ago

                Then I think I’m all set to transition. Thanks for answering all my questions. I appreciate it!

  • gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I am guessing the build in flathub ships with this turned off, I dont even have firefox suggest as a settings area. Nor is it in the build that ships with Fedora

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    And here’s where you turn it off:

    Yeah. That’s why none of us ever see that crap. It’s easy.

    • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      They make most of it (a boatload already) from their google deal, how about using it better

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        24 hours ago

        The Google deal is a problematic dependency and a single point of failure. I don’t like putting ads in the browser as an alternative, but I’m unsure what would be a good funding model for the project.

        Mozilla should definitely focus its resources on improving the browser rather than side quests.

        • tempest@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Even more problematic because the LLM are destroying search.

          Wait till people freak the fuck out when it becomes the Gemini bar.

        • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          I think they have plenty of resources already, some of their uses are questionable. Mail/VPN (i think they already rolled out their own vpn service for some countries) could be a sidequest not for the sake of a sidequest, doubt it’s gonna match 500M per year though

          • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Firefox doesn’t do mail AFAIK. Thunderbird is a different branch and is funded separately.

            The VPN is just a re-skinned Mullvad last time I checked.

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Mozilla is simultaneously both a genius Google-sponsored company that you can’t criticize their decisions because you don’t fund them, and a money-starved company that needs to make a profit and you’re a monster for denying them the revenue

        • one_old_coder@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          23 hours ago

          because you don’t fund them

          Also you cannot fund them. All the money you give goes to Mozilla and its CEO which needs $millions to take those stupid decisions.

        • Vincent@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Mozilla is simultaneously a vassal of Google because it’s 85% funded by its search revenue, and an over-resourced company that is a monster for trying to bring in even more revenue.

        • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Benefits of their Corp/Foundation structure I guess. Though if I was funding them I’d criticize them harder lol

      • ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Diversification is a good thing. If people don’t donate at scale then we have Chrome, and FF so long as Google allows it to exist unless they find other streams.

      • cqgbp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Google “deal” … Google gain way more coz we don’t have MozillaOS today.

        Also, they sold and selling users to search engines and still more and more milking their users…

        Using FF we get double fck*d…if not using forks, a better option will be Chrome at this point

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    anyone know the about:config value key?

    edit: found it. Set browser.urlbar.suggest.quicksuggest.all to false. For anyone not using user.js, I highly recommend it. It means you only ever have to find these settings once. I keep mine in a git repo so it’s easy to transport between machines.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Sure. User.js is a file you can add in your Firefox profile directory which gets loaded each time Firefox starts.

        Pretty good documentation here: https://kb.mozillazine.org/User.js_file

        The arkenfox one is a fully loaded pro-privacy user.js made by some knowledgeable people. I did use that one for my initial version iirc: https://github.com/arkenfox/user.js/blob/master/user.js

        How often do I update it? Just when mozilla rolls out a new feature I don’t like. I commit it to my repo, that way I easily take my settings to each different machine. You cannot change every FF setting with that file, but you can change the majority of them.

        • somereaduser@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          So two things: basically install user.js and forget it (except changing minor settings you want).

          What about recommended extesnsions. It just says minimize extensions (which is a good policy), but which extensions are recommended to use with it.

          Are there certain privacy extensions that are redundant because of it?

          I understand I may be asking things outside of your purview, but I am curious how does this work.

          Interesting enough, if I visit a fingerprinting site such as kuber.studio/cookie, it still recognizes me as a visitor, even with user.js.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Yeah, I’m not a privacy expert. And I didn’t ever think of user.js as privacy protection personally. I use it to turn off AI and other things that annoy me. Privacy-wise I use OBO and few others. The arkenfox settings I used as a basis but I removed anything that wasn’t ai related or that I didn’t understand.

            • somereaduser@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              I think the main protection I’m looking for at the moment is fingerprinting protection. ON their site they do claim that, but there isn’t much info (at least that I can understand about that).

              • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Okay, that is a different topic in my mind. User.js is about settings. The settings it impacts can be anything. You may want to try librewolf if privacy is your focus.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        You can, that’s easily found and the point of the post. I don’t want to do that on four machines every time I end up needing to reset Firefox

  • ryantown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ah, dang. This is as real bummer. What do we do instead? Are we at the point of paying for this app?

    I’m thinking about Signal too: software isn’t free so where does the spend come from?

    • Vincent@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Signal is funded by donations. They got a few pretty big ones a while ago from some wealthy donors, so I don’t know whether the donations by normal people by now are enough to cover their costs. I try to donate a bit though, at least enough to cover my costs and those of a few of my friends.

    • Clambake0351@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Check the box and forget the feature ever existed until you install the browser again from scratch. It’s been there for 5 years, so it’s not exactly a new or unsolved problem.

        • Clambake0351@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          20 hours ago

          It comes up every few months because someone forgets they ticked it off 5 years ago when the feature first released and then they reset their browser.

          • ryantown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            It’s not a crowd setting; it’s maintaining a product. We love this one because it matches our goal, but that goal requires our fellow persons’ time.

    • oneser@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I have started regularly donating to foss projects, especially those who are clear on their limits of ai in code. Been donating to signal for years too.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I would pay for Firefox if they kept updates like that off by default. Maybe they could have a screen that shows new options you can turn on which I’d happily ignore most of the time. It obviously takes tons of time to build a web browser so I expect it to get paid for somehow, but yeah, the on-by-default enshittification is no good.

    • moth@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      as someone else suggested, a fork is the best way to go. if you are most concerned about privacy, Liberwolf is the way to go. if you want privacy, but aren’t willing to go as far as Librewolf does, then Waterfox is a solid alternative that provides better privacy than Firefox.