Smooth Dunk | Bluesky

Transcript

3 panel comic

Panel 1: Red Guy in t-shirt is sitting at a desk being interviewed. He says “AI is going to kill us all”

Panel 2: Interviewer looking directly into camera, says “Well, we’ve heard from the anti-Ai guy. Now let’s hear from the CEO of AI

Panel 3: Wide shot revealing the second interviewee looking slightly confused. He says “I’m the Anti-AI guy”

  • emb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    It is a little hard to see any actually happening, but I could imagine several scenarios:

    • AI helping smaller scale actors build stronger tools of destruction

    If it didn’t take nation-state level resources to build a nuke-level threat, easy to see how a few wackos could end us all. Could be bombs with less materials, bio-weapons, grey goo, whatever.

    • Cyber security breaches enacting MAD

    Presumably existing nuclear arsenals are well secured, but doesn’t seem beyond belief to imagine a hole that a persistent bot swarm could crack open.

    • AI in hardware

    We’re a ways away from sticking frontier models into small computers, but the push for robots is there. Once they have bodies in the real world, the limits are off for what harm they can cause. All the same unintended cyber attacks we’re getting from test environments now will then become physical harm, and with enough resources you could see it getting dire.

    Typing those out though, does make me see how farfetch’d they kind of are. Which is good! I’d be all for it if the doomsday stuff turns out to be a big nothing.

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Having means still doesn’t automatically confer motivation.

      All of these scenarios overlook that it’s built from what people say online. There’s just as much chance that an AI would decide to save the planet. How much has been written against tech billionaires?

      How much has been written about climate change?

      Why wouldn’t AI share our concerns if it’s trained on them?

      Have we considered that when tech billionaires say “AI will kill us”… They mean THEM. They might be seeing AI reflect instructions against billionaires that we’ve already embedded into the discourse? That we’ve written in comments and articles and blogs across the Internet?