How so? I am genuinely interested to be proven wrong, I’m just not seeing it. They’ve held dynastic control as general secretaries of the WPK have they not?
Cowbee has provided enough information to you for you to realize this, but you still ignore or twist it all in your fucked liberal mind.
and not look like we’re seeing SS symbols where they aren’t there. I’m happy to discuss that further.
See? You still deny the SS symbol. You even went like “that resembles the SS symbol” last time. Go back to reddit.
Cowbee has provided enough information to you for you to realize this, but you still ignore or twist it all in your fucked liberal mind.
No need to be mean. I’m trying my best to understand the points you and Cowbee are making. Liberals blindly accept propaganda, I’m trying to think for myself here.
See? You still deny the SS symbol. You even went like “that resembles the SS symbol” last time.
I think it’s important to distinguish whether something is an SS symbol or something looks like an SS symbol. They may very well have done it on pupose for plausible deniability, but if we’re not precise in our language, we give ammunition to the enemy.
No need to be mean. I’m trying my best to understand the points you and Cowbee are making. Liberals blindly accept propaganda, I’m trying to think for myself here.
No you are not, you’re prodding and prodding while ignoring any and all points given until you get to one that seems even remotely flawed to you for you to hyperfocus on and criticize. Not honest at all.
I think it’s important to distinguish whether something is an SS symbol or something looks like an SS symbol. They may very well have done it on pupose for plausible deniability, but if we’re not precise in our language, we give ammunition to the enemy.
LITERALLY the SS symbol that you said was “blurry and looks like 44” like stop pretending.
No you are not, you’re prodding and prodding while ignoring any and all points given until you get to one that seems even remotely flawed to you for you to hyperfocus on and criticize. Not honest at all.
I think an argument is only as strong as its weakest link, and if I’m going to argue this with other people, I need to understand how well the argument holds up under pressure. Which I think is best done through prodding at weak points. No intention to offend.
LITERALLY the SS symbol that you said was “blurry and looks like 44” like stop pretending.
It definitely looks a lot like the SS symbol, no doubt about. Probably too much to be coincidence. But higher resolution pictures of the patch (assuming it’s the same patch) show that it is not literally the SS symbol:
Fair if you d. I don’t mean to condone anything with this, I just can’t ignore what I see with my eyes.
Cowbee has provided enough information to you for you to realize this, but you still ignore or twist it all in your fucked liberal mind.
See? You still deny the SS symbol. You even went like “that resembles the SS symbol” last time. Go back to reddit.
Just like all the libs who said Platners tattoo was a pirate symbol, LOL.
Libs: “Elon did the Nazi salute!”
ML: “Yeah, and Platner has a tattoo of the Totenkopf, an unmistakenly Nazi symbol of death”
Libs: “Okay now hold on a moment…”
No need to be mean. I’m trying my best to understand the points you and Cowbee are making. Liberals blindly accept propaganda, I’m trying to think for myself here.
I think it’s important to distinguish whether something is an SS symbol or something looks like an SS symbol. They may very well have done it on pupose for plausible deniability, but if we’re not precise in our language, we give ammunition to the enemy.
No you are not, you’re prodding and prodding while ignoring any and all points given until you get to one that seems even remotely flawed to you for you to hyperfocus on and criticize. Not honest at all.
LITERALLY the SS symbol that you said was “blurry and looks like 44” like stop pretending.
I think an argument is only as strong as its weakest link, and if I’m going to argue this with other people, I need to understand how well the argument holds up under pressure. Which I think is best done through prodding at weak points. No intention to offend.
It definitely looks a lot like the SS symbol, no doubt about. Probably too much to be coincidence. But higher resolution pictures of the patch (assuming it’s the same patch) show that it is not literally the SS symbol:
Fair if you d. I don’t mean to condone anything with this, I just can’t ignore what I see with my eyes.