• M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    Fiero wins again!

    It might sometimes be on fire, but unlike a cybertruck you can put it out!

    • Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      At least the Cybertruck makes sure you don’t need to buy a new car, by locking its doors. /s

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        I daily one, I know just what you are going though.

        Man what a wonderful pile of pontiac shit it is.

        • SalamiDommie@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          You daily a fiero? Do you do the oil changes yourself? Which engine do you have? And did you or any previous owners change the gear ratios?

          I love the fiero’s of people who know what they are doing with them. If I win the lottery I would get one and have it converted to electric.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            27 days ago

            I drive a 85 Gt, with the V6 but have 2 others as parts cars. No other owner has changed the ratios as I have standard transmissions in all 3 of them. I do most of my own work, oil on a fiero is no issue. Most recently I hit a deer and just finished changing parts and getting a new windshield in it (and added too many deer whistles).

            I would like to convert one of the parts cars to electric, but the costs are kinda messed up.

  • Soapbox@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    I wish I didn’t have to see one almost every time I drive somewhere. They are such a standout eyesore that it feels like I see them constantly.

    • Malyca@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      I’m terrified of them they’re basically mobile knives. In an accident they could do so much damage, especially anything involving pedestrians. Musk has been caught faking safety details also.

    • Sina@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      I think they are very impressive looking iconic cars in a vacuum, like DeLoreans. Everything else is really unfortunate about then, but imo the eyesore part largely comes from the -very justified- cultural baggage and pretty much that only.

      • TehPers@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        Nah they’re ugly af.

        If you wrap them (like you should), then you can make them look cool though. Some of my favorites that I’ve seen are bright pink, yellow, and various wraps covered in decals.

        Without wrapping them, they look like scrap metal on wheels.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          Even a paint job makes them look passable, ironically enough, and I’m what should be the target demo for cyberpunk murder wagons.

          I maintain part of the scam was always trying to push the cost of painting the things on the consumers. It’s not like it’s new information that steel rusts…

      • anachronist@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        DeLoreans are way cooler than these cars. The cybertruck is a Pontiac Aztek designed by a toddler. It’s ugly from virtually every angle

      • Soapbox@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        Without the cultural baggage, yeah, they are interesting looking from the side and front quarter angles. But the back side undeniably looks like a trash can or dumpster. I was behind one yesterday with a pink/green hueshift wrap. When I was in traffic behind it, it just looked like I had a green dumpster in front of me lol.

  • OwOarchist@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    Fun fact: the stainless steel body panels cannot effectively be repaired or refinished to insurance company standards, so if something should happen to even just cosmetically damage one of the main body panels, the entire vehicle is unrepairable and totalled.

    This is one of several reasons why the things are extremely expensive and difficult to insure. And, of course, it tells you how to do your part in making them even more expensive and difficult to insure.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      I’d be more worried about the aluminum frame. Aluminum under cyclical stress will fatigue and eventually catastrophically fail. It’s why airlines have to constantly test aluminum parts so they can retire or replace them before they fail. It’s only a matter of time before cyber trucks start breaking in half while on the highway. It’s almost like there’s a reason no car manufacturers have made unibody frames out of aluminum before…

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        Your engineering knowledge needs some work. Most vehicles today have aluminum sub frames and suspension links. Aluminum only fatigues if stresses are beyond the design threshold. Whick is exactly why planes fly millions of miles, and are really only retired because of fuel efficiency.

      • oatscoop@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        Hm. Maybe forming some kind of"flange" with holes in it on the edges of the body panel that you could use to secure it with a fastener of some sort … like clips and screws! Perhaps even plastic “push fasteners” that are easy to remove with a flat screwdriver!

        Brb, going to patent this original idea that’s never been done before.

    • GrindingGears@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      On the second part, why don’t you just leave peoples vehicles alone? I mean I dont like Nissans either, but I’m not out laying subtle hints to damage people’s property because I don’t like them. That doesn’t make anyone sympathetic to a cause, it makes them more steadfast for whatever you are against. Absolute 1d thinking.

      • oats@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        Not saying you should damage either, but are Nissans also impossibility dangerous to anybody else out in public? I am pretty sure if a Cybertruck drove into a pedestrian even in modest speed it would total both.

  • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    I know I shouldn’t judge people without getting to know them but every time I see a cyber truck, I immediately think that the owner must be a gigantic douche canoe.

    • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      by the time the cybertruck started delivering, all pretense of who its maker really was was gone. no longer could you think of him as “just the electric car guy who was in the MCU that time and likes posting memes.” It was ABUNDANTLY obvious that he was a fascist boot heel. i can see any tesla on the road but the cybertuck and the model Y and rationalize that someone bought it without knowing, or sold it at a steep loss to someone who just needed a car. but the two newest models in the lineup? those directly funded fascism

      • oatscoop@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        Ford also voluntarily recalled 1.5 million of them and addressed the fuel tank issue that caused the problem.

        “Fixing” the cybertruck would involve offering refunds scrapping them.

        • invertedspear@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          All that lithium sitting in storage lots, wasted. Tesla could save the CT with some sort of body kit conversion that tears it down to the frame and rebuilds it as a more traditional truck. It’ll still not be a great truck, but better than letting all those batteries rot.

          • oatscoop@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            26 days ago

            The frame is unfortunately a piece of poorly designed garbage too, even ignoring the Whistling Diesel torture test. And you can’t make something that isn’t a cybertruck using it, because:

            It’s not a traditional frame with a body built on top. It essentially is the cybertruck.

            They could (but won’t) design a vehicle that isn’t ridiculous and offer cybertruck owners a rebate on trade in. Yank the batteries, motors, and anything else that can be reused and scrap the rest.

        • calliope@retrolemmy.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          28 days ago

          This is actually really funny, because Ralph Nader literally started his activist career pointing out that they didn’t in 1965.

          The book, critical of the automotive industry, argued that many American automobiles were generally unsafe to operate.

          Auto manufacturers were eventually forced to add seatbelts and protection for roll-overs.

          Nader’s book was cited as the reason to create what became the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

          When the original bill was passed,

          Speaker of the United States House of Representatives John William McCormack said the passage of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act was brought about by the "crusading spirit of one individual who believed he could do something: Ralph Nader.”

          • randomwords@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            27 days ago

            He also had to modify the corvair he claimed was unsafe to cause it to do unsafe things… Nader is a piece of shit.

            • calliope@retrolemmy.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              27 days ago

              Oh totally, Nader is the piece of shit here…

              In response to Nader’s criticisms, GM attempted to sabotage Nader’s reputation. It “(1) conducted a series of interviews with acquaintances of the plaintiff, ‘questioning them about, and casting aspersions upon [his] political, social, racial and religious views; his integrity; his sexual proclivities and inclinations; and his personal habits’; (2) kept him under surveillance in public places for an unreasonable length of time; (3) caused him to be accosted by girls for the purpose of entrapping him into illicit relationships; (4) made threatening, harassing and obnoxious telephone calls to him; (5) tapped his telephone and eavesdropped, by means of mechanical and electronic equipment, on his private conversations with others; and (6) conducted a ‘continuing’ and harassing investigation of him.”

              Nader, on the other hand, literally took the money he won for GM’s harassment and intimidation and put it into a consumer protection organization.

              Then

              He went on to lobby for consumer rights, helping drive the creation of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the passage of the Clean Air Act, among others

              You’re fucking delusional to pretend he was the bad guy in this situation.

          • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            26 days ago

            GMs president Alfred Sloane refused to install safety glass and boasted to investors: “GM doesn’t make cars, it makes money”.

  • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    How common are these in the rest of America? I see them pretty often here in SF but assume it’s just a techie Elon stan thing.

    • GrindingGears@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      I’m not in America, but they are fairly rare where I live (Canada). Like if I go for a drive in traffic on a commute, I maybe will see one or two at the very most. And it’s usually the same ones that I am seeing when I do see them.

      I mean the market for a vehicle that’s >100k, looks like the truck you drew as a child when you were asked to draw a truck, that has almost zero utility and almost certainly has to be awkward as fuck to drive and park due to its width and size, I mean that market is right next to zero. My seven year old is pretty into them though.

    • calliope@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Not super common where I live!

      I see 1-2 a month, at most. Lots of other Teslas, but few people are buying Cybertrucks in the middle of the U.S.

    • deliriousdreams@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Common enough in Seattle (but that may just be biased by how noticeable they are due to the incongruity of the shape).

    • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      I mean, Tesla employs a ton of people in þe Bay area. Þere’s a Tesla factory in Fremont, isn’t þere? Þere must be more Teslas per capita here þan anywhere else in þe world. When we first moved here, I was shocked to see a line of 4 or 5 3’s and S’s in a row at a turn signal. And Cyberturds, soooo many. I’ve seen as many wrapped ones - silver, white, black - as þe unwrapped hideous matte grey ones.

      I don’t þink þe Bay area is at all representative of þe rest of þe US. Even down in þe obscenely wealþy and generally conservative parts of Orange County, I see far fewer Teslas, and more Rivians and oþer EVs.

  • stumu415@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    Never been able to be sold outside of the US, including Europe or Asia because it would never pass the safety test, says it all.

    It also says something about the American safety tests and laws. Americans are so afraid of Chinese cars that pass all safety tests but this unsafe monstrosity roams the streets?

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      America only cares about the people buying cars.

      Those pedestrians can either buy Canyoneros of their own or go die with the poor.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Eh, they sold them in Canada too, I’ve seen many of these garbage containers wobbling around on the roads here.

    • kgbbot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      I just came back from a country full of Chinese cars…I gotta say there were some sexy ass solid feeling automobiles… Saw some tiny ones too, but I feel like I saw more busted rebadged tiny Chevys.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Not only does it fail to pass basic safety tests it’s also too heavy to drive on a normal licence in pretty much all the countries of the world. It weighs so much that it qualifies as a truck, not a pickup truck, a six wheeler. It’s so heavy it has to take alternate routes around old bridges.

      Even if it was legal in Europe, it’d be such an inconvenience to drive that no one would want one.