• clover@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    High taxes are fine if it means that I don’t need a savings account to live. No need to save for retirement if my basic needs are met. Need being the operative word, it is important to still have the option at least until we can move to a post-scarcity gift economy, but I doubt we’d be ready for that in the next 250 years.

      • clover@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        I have that same problem now, because my healthcare costs so much and I’m young and healthy! If only there was a cheaper way to pay for that like every other developed nation in the world does.

        • panthera_@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          No, your payments subsidize those who are unhealthy such as the elderly, otherwise their payments would skyrocket.

          • clover@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            Sure, but why does American healthcare cost 2-5x what it does in other countries, esp. When our care is ranked 9th against them?

            My point is it doesn’t matter if what I’m paying is a “tax” or premium, I still have to pay it. Why put a profiteer between people and access to medical care? How does that benefit society?

            • panthera_@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Profits motivate medical companies to compete. If there is just one medical company owned by the government, there will certainly be waste. The workers will probably be overpaid and more than needed.