• TipRing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      4 days ago

      They literally gave $1M to Make America Great Again, Inc. last year just after the FDA announced it was suspending implementation of the food tracing rule. So, yeah, they paid the bribe last year.

    • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      4 days ago

      I mean it’s the Trump Administration’s FDA full of his sycophants so I would unfortunately have to guess that it’s as legitimate as any other claim this administration has made.

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      The FDA said Saturday’s positive test was an erroneous result based on false amplification.

      Sounds like someone in the FDA lab fucked up. Possibly any retests too, since I doubt they went straight from initial positive test to recall. What a shitshow. I wonder if it’s from inexperience or overwork due to cuts.

        • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          You’re right, a gutted FDA couldn’t make mistakes. It’s probably a vast conspiracy that involves the very scientists racing to figure out the source of this also being complicit in covering it up.

          • village604@adultswim.fan
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 days ago

            Both a gutted FDA and a large company paying the Trump administration a bribe for preferential treatment are pretty equal in likelihood.

            But considering this company has already paid a bribe to the Trump administration to get rid of food tracing rules, the conspiracy is probably more likely.

            Without an independent lab verifying the samples, you should take the FDA’s retraction with a pitcher of salt.

      • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        So you’re suggesting that the most rational explanation is that the FDA did the initial test, got a false positive, then presumably did it again, and got at least one ADDITIONAL false positive, for a protist for which the species in question is the only one in its genus which uses humans as hosts. The company found it so credible that they PUBLICLY copped to it, but then it turns out that it was ALL false positives? You’re suggesting that that is the most likely scenario?

      • Somebody_Else@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Sounds like someone in the FDA lab fucked up.

        Nah

        Possibly any retests too, since I doubt they went straight from initial positive test to recall. What a shitshow. I wonder if it’s from inexperience or overwork due to cuts.

        The FDA didnt mess up.

        The FDA found the culprits, and then Trump was bribed to tell the FDA to find evidence that the initial test was a false positive.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    Why did Taylor Farms not have produce tested themselves? We need a third independent testing to verify who is lying, the FDA or Taylor Farms. And if TF is a false positive, how did people actually get sick?

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    Well, if Taylor Farms destroyed a bunch of their lettuce based on the initial information from the FDA, I wonder if they have a good lawsuit?

  • Arancello@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    So I learned that the leaders of Taylor Farms went to the Whitehouse. After the meeting they are allowed to continue poisoning usa people. Hmmm. Read between the lines?