True ‘skeletonization’ also includes the trimming away of any non-essential metal on the bridge, plate, wheel train or any other mechanical part of the watch, leaving only a minimalist ‘bare’ skeleton of the movement required for functionality.

  • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Okay neat but why? Does look practically to tell time. Reminds me the time the Fossil Watch store sold sundail watches.

    • ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Seiko invented the self-winding watch, which has a big counterweight on the back, so as you moved around, the counterweight swung around, naturally winding the watch throughout your day. It was a notable innovation, and kind of confusing to describe, so Seiko put glass backings on their watches so you could watch the counterweight swing. I believe that was the event that made it a mainstream trend. Flashier brands like Seiko and Swatch were big fans of it, but higher end brands like Rolex and Breitling tend to avoid it to make a “We’re not like the others” kinda statement.

    • Mesophar@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Why is for aesthetics. I have a pocket watch like this. I think the gear work is beautiful in its own way, and the front of it is like any normal watch face (just with a transparent face so you can see behind it).

    • jaykrown@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      They aren’t too expensive really, and I think it’s a great thing for people to have something like this that doesn’t rely on anything digital at all.

      • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I looked at a few and there’s some nice designs for <£100 (~110$), but then i realised I’m already too attached to reading the time on my digital watch so i’d never really use it.

  • lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    high-end watches are crazy. this is a 500 grand jacob & co astronomia:

    they have tons of these, all with free-floating three-axis tourbillions.

    • rose56@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I never liked Jacod & Co, I don’t find their watches useful at all. Imagine walking and your hand goes on the wall.

  • davepleasebehave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    could someone recommend a good cheap starter?

    I’m always over stimulated by the choice and want something nice and quality for the money.

    Is 200 too cheap?

    • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      For a skeleton watch, yes.
      For a mechanical watch, also yes.
      Unfortunately, prices have gone through the roof in the past few years.
      Now I don’t think there are any nice quality watches left in that price range.

      You can still get a Vostok Amphibia for that kind of money, which is entirely hand-crafted, definitely interesting mechanically, and will last decades. But buying from Russia at the moment (on a Russian website), waiting a month for delivery, and getting the Vostok experience isn’t everyone’s cup of tea. Also, I don’t think it’s even possible to get them shipped to the US.

      Even a nice Quartz watch like a solar-powered Citizen Eco-Drive will be slightly out of your budget.
      If you still do want a mechanical watch, look for Seiko, Citizen and Orient. Those are the best budget offerings.
      Chinese Red Star watches also fit the budget, but they’re also not for everyone.

      • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I second Citizen Eco-Drive

        I have a ton of watches and I wear my Citizen Eco-Drive Primo Stingray 620 pretty much everyday.

        Definitely would suggest a solar or motion powered watch. Batteries are a pain.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m happy with my Seiko 5. It was like 90$ when I got it 7-8 years ago. It took a bit for it to “wear in” but now it keeps time for months without me having to set it.

    • rustydrd@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Some companies have mechanical watches in the 400-500€ range that can go for 200€ used. I have a Junkers that I bought used for 200€ some years ago, and it’s got a glass bottom (other models do, too). But honestly, I wouldn’t make this a criterion, because you rarely see the back, and skeleton watches can sometimes look tacky.

    • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      If you’re any dexterous at all, you can build a completely custom one that you choose all the parts for~$150. And it’s the same movement they use in some $1000+ pieces.

      • quick_snail@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s the worst advice for someone who said they have too many options and are overstimulated

    • LincolnsDogFido@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Seiko makes excellent mechanical wrist watches. What is your intrigue? I’m assuming you like the idea of mechanical wrist watches and want a timepiece that is accurate and built to last. $200 is just a little below their entry price point I believe but you can always find used watches on eBay/Marketplace and the like. If you learn a little bit more about the industry then you might be able to find a bargain and get it serviced to work like new.

      I got extremely lucky when I was fixated on the idea of owning or restoring a mechanical watch when I learned that my grandfather left behind a 1930’s Hamilton. Nothing super high end, but a watch that would probably go for $600 today and was my style. I find it hard to match my style today because it seems everyone is searching for a massive statement piece on their wrist. I just wanted a watch that ticks when its quiet, has character, and can be passed on to my own children.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      There’s plenty to be had for under $50, actually. I had an awesome one, but broke the sapphire in it. That was like 20 years ago :-\

  • teft@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I had a fake Breitling that was like that. It was so beautiful just watching the mechanism tick away.

  • kat_angstrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Not sure if this counts or not, but Swatch has many lovely pieces that showcase the internal components, most of which go for under $300. This one has been my daily driver for about 18 months now

    • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      My old (2005?) Swatch skin was similar but it had no ring to contrast the hands. It’s kind of a cheat watch since it ticks once every 15 seconds, and doesn’t carry a second hand. But I did enjoy it until the face got severely scratched. Don’t reach behind stuff with your watch hand.

  • rose56@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Skeletons are beautiful but expensive. Some of them even have open heart, which is more open inside.

  • henfredemars@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I enjoy these very much, while also adoring my low-key mechanicals for the understated beauty.

  • Tiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    As a watch collector, they’re usually on the cheap side. Not that there’s anything wrong with that, but they’re usually on the shitty side as well. Kind of like those weird ass knives at truck stops are basically Chinese pot metal crap, they just want someone to think they’re cool who has no idea what they’re buying.

    • jaykrown@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Maybe some, but can’t you actually get one that’s made well? I’ve seen a few for a couple hundred.

      • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I have a few. They really run the gamut. I have some very nice pieces, and a handful of extremely cheap ones from Ali Express which, ironically enough, get more road time. Jaeger le coultre is kinda infamous for their skeleton guys, although known for being some what overpriced for the quality. You want to see a really cool one where the movement itself is built into the hands? Look up ulysse nardin freak.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve found plenty that are very nice quality. I mean like the decently good Bulova/Citizen kind of quality, and not the TAG Hauer / Breguet kind. But that’s a pretty long way from shitty Chinesium. Although there’s plenty of shitty watches of all kinds, too.

  • jmill@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Back when my wife and i were dating I kept talking about wanting a skeleton watch, but I never thought to communicate what that was, and didn’t know why she was always so profoundly unenthused by something I was showing interest in, it was unlike her. She was much happier about it when my folks got me one for x-mas and she found out it it was not, in fact, a watch decorated with skeletons, lmao.