Godric@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agoplease bro just one more try brolemmy.worldimagemessage-square53linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageplease bro just one more try brolemmy.worldGodric@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square53linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareMulligrubs@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-22 months agoIf you look at the same source that you’ve provided, you will also see that using the label “whataboutism” is in itself a fallacy and propaganda strategy. So… irrelevant… your fallacious propaganda strategy is rejected.
minus-squareViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months ago using the label “whataboutism” is in itself a fallacy and propaganda strategy. Is has been CLAIMED by people defending their own use of whataboutism, sure, but they’re wrong. They’re literally claiming that it’s a tu quoque (appeal to hypocrisy) fallacy to point out this particular tu quoque fallacy 🙄 So… irrelevant… your fallacious propaganda strategy is rejected. Right back at you.
If you look at the same source that you’ve provided, you will also see that using the label “whataboutism” is in itself a fallacy and propaganda strategy.
So… irrelevant… your fallacious propaganda strategy is rejected.
Is has been CLAIMED by people defending their own use of whataboutism, sure, but they’re wrong.
They’re literally claiming that it’s a tu quoque (appeal to hypocrisy) fallacy to point out this particular tu quoque fallacy 🙄
Right back at you.