• flactwin@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    so more restrictions, cool, interesting but how much they have to do to totaly inject hate in their userbase like facebook did

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s not a restriction, it’s user control. You can have them always on (and I suspect that will stay as the default), turn them off, or anything in between.

      You just got more tools to control the interface and remove what you don’t care about, what’s wrong about that?

      • flactwin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        appreciate it but just not write full reply, i thought: yes this feature is great but they have more restrictions and always fight adblockers, yes this still understandable by this is biggest video sharing service

      • baines@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        lol there is no 0 option

        this isn’t about user control this is getting ahead of CYA because regulation is likely coming given multiple countries are serious about limiting ages that can access social media

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          You mean, no such option in an app? Because at least the article and the post clearly state you can opt for 0.