ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 9 months agoPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comexternal-linkmessage-square119linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 9 months agomessage-square119linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareonlooker@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoUgh, so tired of this old argument. Nothing to hide doesn’t mean everything to show. There, now let’s get on with our lives.
minus-squareslappyfuck@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoBack in the late 90s when people started saying that to me, I’d just say ok, get naked RIGHT NOW. What, now you’ve got something to hide? A few people took me seriously from that but it usually just fell short.
Ugh, so tired of this old argument. Nothing to hide doesn’t mean everything to show. There, now let’s get on with our lives.
Back in the late 90s when people started saying that to me, I’d just say ok, get naked RIGHT NOW. What, now you’ve got something to hide?
A few people took me seriously from that but it usually just fell short.