This is in India, but coming soon to a country near you (or the one you are in already).

  • Darkness343@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Just wait until we develop psychic powers.

    Let’s see how private your thoughts will be then.

    This is just to get us accustomed to the idea that privacy will be nonexistent at some point.

      • Darkness343@lemmy.worldBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        First attempts almost never work. Just wait until they make it better and develop more powerful psychic abilities like in Stellaris.

        Not their pathetic attempts from project stargate

  • MathematicalMagpie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    “Cheery was aware that Commander Vimes didn’t like the phrase ‘The innocent have nothing to fear’, believing the innocent had everything to fear, mostly from the guilty but in the longer term even more from those who say things like ‘The innocent have nothing to fear’.” ― Terry Pratchett, Snuff

    • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.onlineOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Saying ‘I have nothing to fear because I have nothing to hide’ is like saying ‘I don’t care for free speech because I have nothing to say’.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Always bad when the net policy is made by old people which confuse an remote control with an smartphone.

  • onlooker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Ugh, so tired of this old argument. Nothing to hide doesn’t mean everything to show. There, now let’s get on with our lives.

    • slappyfuck@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Back in the late 90s when people started saying that to me, I’d just say ok, get naked RIGHT NOW. What, now you’ve got something to hide?

      A few people took me seriously from that but it usually just fell short.

  • reparæi [he/all]@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Meanwhile we can’t release the voter both footage because privacy of the voters, destroying Right to Information Act because privacy, if you have a lot of money then only do you start to need privacy after all!

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    A lot of countries are increasingly overreaching with privacy. There is global-wide coordination going on that we haven’t seen since the leftist international during Cold War, but this time it’s coming from the right.

  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    One of many countries who have recently decided that basic liberty is more trouble than it’s worth. Our governments all just need to admit that we are engaged in informational WW3.

  • Sunflier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Oh dear god, I thought this was the US Supreme Court, which is bound by the 4th Amendment. Turns out this is the Supreme Court from the State of Telangana in India.