Just look at all this other stuff - it will make you feel better about the conflagration outside your door

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    No I am not entertained. In fact. I am fed up with all the coverage of them. Let them live their lives in peace so those of us out here tired of the show can also live in peace.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    distraction of the masses from politics, a tale as old as time. people are too invested in sports/celebreties often are very ignorant of the policies/politics around them, and they dont realize this just a distraction from Class issues.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    look how much i don’t care guys, i made a monument to the things i don’t care about.

    not caring about things is not a virtue. you want people to care about something else you should work on that messaging. “you’re stupid to care about this” is reddit atheist coded bullshit that has never worked in the history of mankind.

    • TipsyMcGee@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s possible to not give a fuck about Taylor Swift, but still care about her and her fellow billionaires outright destroying the world while glitzy magazines treat them as main characters in a soap opera, just going about their glamorous exploits and intrigue. It is fucking stupid to celebrate Taylor Swift’s anything, for as long as she remains a prime example of everything that is going wrong in the world: massive hoarding of wealth in a winner takes all economy obsessed with intangible assets (notably brands and song rights), excessive personal consumption and burning of fossil fuels, hyper commercialized culture mostly void of artistic expression.

      I don’t mind people that like her songs, but I’m fairly certain Swifties should be designated a death cult.

    • Logical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Imo it is fucking stupid to care about this stuff though. Celebrity worship is a cancer. Obsessing about the love lives of total strangers because they’re famous is not only pointless but also destructive.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        i don’t care about it but i also find the air of superiority from people who boast about not caring about this to be worse than actually caring about it. everyone cares about stupid shit. people just talk about this because it’s more demographically aligned with women. there’s disproportionate hate towards things women tend to like because we’re taught from childhood that it’s uncool.

        guarantee most of the people shitting on it here either mald about some ladder they’re unhealthily trying to climb, or have a pokemon card collection, or treat that one movie they found to be super cool as their bible or some shit.

        let people enjoy what they like. don’t act you only care about the environment and world hunger.

        • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          because society pushes women to like these things under social pressure. it’s kind of gross. there’s nothing wrong with things women like, but this is manufactured. But hey, better than MAGA’s worshipping drump.

          • pyre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            yeah but what i said extend to everything women and especially young women and girls like.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    “We should stop indulging in celebrity and start GIVING A FUCK!”

    “Okay, what should we care about?”

    <insert list of cataclysmic horrors for which nobody in the audience has any agency>

    “Wow, thanks. Now I’m full of helpless anxiety. Anything I can do about any of this?”

    “DO SOMETHING! DO SOMETHING! DO SOMETHING!”

    “Well, this has been enervating as fuck. If you don’t mind, I’m going back to hide in my den and watch movies until the world ends.”

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I really despise this type of argument. There’s plenty you can care about that isn’t billionaire pop stars or famines.

      Theres so much optimistic shit these days and education has never been this accessible. Join a book club, environmental club, local community, hobby niche, care about different countries and regions. I barely find enough free time for all these activities.

      There are literally a billion things you should care more about than a billionaires getting engaged. It’s frankly disgusting.

    • normalexit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think the key here is “we”. Collectively if people had a common understanding of what is going on in the world they would be appalled and demand more of our leaders (or get new ones)

      Instead people vaguely know what is going on, through the biased lense of their news sources.

      I think if you asked most Americans who Netanyahu is and what he is doing you’d get a blank stare. If you ask them what is up with tswift they would excitedly explain that she just got engaged and recently had a crazy expensive tour.

      How any of this gets corrected is beyond me, and that’s exactly how the people in power want it.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think if you asked most Americans who Netanyahu is and what he is doing you’d get a blank stare.

        Idk about that. His name has been in national news for decades. Like, maybe somewhere behind Vladimir Putin and Kim Jung Un in terms of US visibility.

        How any of this gets corrected is beyond me

        Say what you will about the Trotskyists, but they looooved making newspapers. I don’t think there’s a shortage of modern Alt-Media, either. Not hard to get an earful of press about the state of the world. What’s much more tricky is coordinating actions, particularly at the local level. There is not, to my knowledge, a Houston-centric news organization that does a good job of organizing and orienting local people on municipal issues. But I’m a white atheist professional worker out in the suburbs, so its very possible I’m just out of touch with what more radical and well-connected folks in churches and labor unions are up to.

    • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      “Wake up sheeple!”

      “OK cool youre right I see now, I understand. What are we gonna do about it?”

      “They’ve played you for fools! WAKE UP SEE WHATS HAPPENING”

      “Yeah I see its awful. How can we help?”

      “You’re a pawn in their game WAKE UP”

      “Fuck it gonna go have a wank”

  • modestmeme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m annoyed by celebrity culture, but geezus anti-celebrity culture can be just as insufferable.
    Just tune it out people.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Just tune it out people.

      I only ever seem to hear about Taylor Swift via memes that tell me not to care about Taylor Swift.

    • Vupware@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      No! People need to get their heads out of their ass and focus on what is important.

      It is right and just to hate on people who only speak up when the topic is useless drivel. They should be ashamed of their inaction and their complacency is disgusting.

      • FridaySteve@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think we’re at a point where we can all agree that having interests beyond what’s serious and exigent is healthy and reasonable. Now we need to get past the idea that not liking something that’s popular (like sports and entertainment) makes you better than people who do. It doesn’t make you better.

        People who like Taylor and Travis and want them to do well are not automatically complacent in other areas of their lives. They don’t have their heads up their asses for this reason. They have nothing to be ashamed of, talking about topics that, in your opinion, are useless drivel. Especially here, on the internet.

        • Vupware@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          My grievances come from the fact that there’s no counterweight. Posting this type of thing is not inherently bad, but it’s all these people ever post.

          I agree, people can enjoy things I don’t enjoy! But by exclusively posting vapid content, they are diluting the content pool and drowning out what is important.

          Your inaction is your admission of acceptance.

          • FridaySteve@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I really don’t think you’re being fair. I was in chanology in Clearwater, Arab Spring in Rabat, the second Penguin Revolution in Santiago de Chile, and countless major demonstrations in support of worker rights and LGBT community issues all over the world. When I come on the internet (as I’ve done since 1994), I don’t want to endlessly talk about politics with the normies here. I want to talk about normie topics like cooking, cats, sports, and Taylor Swift. I save my outrage for real world actions.

            According to you, I’m practicing an attitude of acceptance with regard to the state of the world because that’s all you see and hear from me. What do you think that says about your worldview and your outlook on people?

            • Vupware@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              You’re right, it is unfair of me to write these people off. Slacktivism is no substitute for real activism.

              It’s just disheartening, weird, and scary seeing everyone repost the same instagram post like little worker bees.

              And personally, I don’t think these people are doing anything behind the scenes to push for change. I suppose I’m just cynical.

  • jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    If we ban private jets, billionaires will just buy every seat on the commercial jet. This will be even more inefficient fuel wise, and worse for the environment overall.

    Don’t ban private jets. Ban billionaires.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      There is an African tribe that picks the wealthiest member of the tribe to take care of everyone until they are broke. They do this willingly because after they spend all their money the tribe takes care of them. They will never need a place to stay because anyone would host them. They don’t need food or clothing because anyone would give them whatever they need.

      We need reset like this. A way to make wealth accumulation a positive thing.

      • plyth@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        This can be done right now. The problem is finding the people who want to live like that. So who wants to live like that? Please reply.

          • plyth@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Why? If you say that we should live like that don’t you want it for yourself?

            • Doomsider@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              I was saying we need something positive to benefit society and the wealthy person to deal with people accumulating too much wealth.

              The story just shows us it is possible and makes me think of other possibilities.

                • Doomsider@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  It has to be a solution that benefits both parties, but I also recognize that one party is giving up something tangible.

                  They have to be compensated in some real way. That is why I propose make a wish for the ultra wealthy. We pick an obscenely rich person, take 99% of what they own, and give them the one thing money can’t buy. A real wish that can be anything humans can reasonably provide.

        • Doomsider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          It was in my Anthropology book, I will have to go dig around for it. I tried a Google search but all I could get was crap.

          • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            It’s just one of those things that sounds sorta believable and has a feel good message but a lot of those are actually bunk

            • Doomsider@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              No, I remember reading it. There is a lot of niche knowledge you cannot find on the Internet easily.

              There are a lot of African traditions around gift giving (like potlatch) and redistribution of wealth as well as concepts of collective wealth (Ubuntu). Here is an article that talks about it, but does not mention the specific tribe I was thinking about. https://www.sociostudies.org/journal/articles/3600660/

              • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                With the article being rather long, does it mention the particular tradition talked about here? I don’t doubt you’ve read it, I am just skeptical if it is a real tradition. And it’s hard to gauge that with no info

                • Doomsider@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  It does talk about leaders not owning their wealth as it was owned collectively by the tribe. No, it does not mention this specific tribe. I can’t find my anthro book either.

                  I could have remembered it wrong. I spent some more time poking around the Internet this morning about chiefdoms. I still couldn’t find the specific tribe, but I learned some other interesting things.

                  There does seem to be some romanticizing small groups and the concept of tribal communism. So there is definitely something to support your skepticism.

  • mavu@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago
    1. Let people be happy about something. this is not helping anyone.

    2. if there is ONE person on the planet who would by popular vote be allowed to have a private jet, it’s TayTay.

    3. Gossip was and is a part of human nature, denying it makes no friends for your cause. Don’t call it bullshit, just because you don’t care.

    If you want to DO ACTUAL GOOD:

    put a story of palestinian/israleli couple on the fake front page.

    Highlight the out of control Israel government with a story that shows protests in israel.

    Be FOR something instead of AGAINST something.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    But at the same time, don’t obsess over a bunch of shit you can’t change. The doom and gloom is mostly there to sell you shit anyway. Unhappy people spend more.

    You can’t fix it. It’s not your job. Unless you want it to be your job by running for government, just vote appropriately for people that might help fix it. That’s your little bit done.

    Live your life. Go for a bike ride. Knock one out.

  • hansolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m marginally happy that anyone anywhere is in love. Cool beans.

    Beyond that, I’d rather see people I know have happy and healthy lives. FSM knows they deserve it just as much as these two.

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    No bread , all circuses

    I’ve been saying a variation for the past year or a bit longer “Circuses are cheap, bread is expensive”
    That’s why we have so much entertaiment, but no housing.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Except the circuses AREN’T cheap anymore either, what with the likes of Ticketmaster/Live Nation making it so a concert ticket costs as much as a car and the NFL’s only goal being to maximize the profits of the team owners.

      Just to use the examples directly related to the billionaire and multimillionaire depicted.

      • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, you’re right. I’m talking more about the clown shows in the news and political systems. Although a netflix subscription or a phone plan is a lot cheaper than a mortgage, and the boomers love to say that the comuters and internet are why we can’t have houses.

        Watching this idiot lipsync after flying in to a concert you paid a month’s wage for is a fucking insult.