• aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Git is so easy to host yourself and everyone went and handed over all their code to evil corp to farm on anyway.

    (Though I do understand that they were bought, but that was a while ago and it was only a matter of time before the evil seeped in.)

    • Lena@gregtech.eu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Their CI/CD minutes are very generous (unlimited!). Plus, if Microsoft wanted to scrape code, it doesn’t have to be on Github. They can scrape it off codeberg too. And I can be sure Github won’t shut down.

      If Github does decide to screw users over, switching to self-hosted forgejo would be trivial.

    • FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think you may be mixing up git, which is a command line tool that’s still open source, AFAIK, with github that’s a closed source, git-based code hosting platform bought by Microsoft.

      You can use other hosting services with git, and get an almost identical experience. Gitlab does it, as well as many others.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s such a simple reason tbh. Github is expected to stay online indefinitely. My VPS? As long as I pay the bill, which I may not want to at some point.

      Codeberg is a decent middle ground - open source projects only. The site itself is open source too.

  • occultist8128@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Interesting post, but maybe better suited for a dev-focused community? Would love to keep this space more for random stuff.

      • occultist8128@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        True, but this kind of trend is why Fediverse platforms often stay programmer-heavy. Regular users join, see mostly dev talk even in general spaces, and bounce. I’m not really against posts like this, but I do wish Lemmy could grow its user base by keeping general spaces genuinely random.

        Also, just being honest, it kind of sucks that my earlier comment got downvoted. I wasn’t trying to gatekeep, just sharing a harmless opinion about keeping the vibe more random and less tech-centered. Felt like I got shut down for it.

        Reddit was like that too. Certain communities gradually became echo chambers just because one group dominated the tone. I’d hate to see Lemmy fall into the same pattern.

        And just to follow the same logic—if dev memes count as “random” in lemmyshitpost, I guess I could post “what programming language should I use to build X?” in asklemmy, right? Feels inconsistent to label one as valid and the other as off-topic, depending on who posts it.

        • HatchetHaro@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          “What programming language should I use to build X” does not belong in AskLemmy, because that’s not the format of question that AskLemmy is for.

          On the other hand, “What programming languages do you guys use” does belong in AskLemmy.

          • occultist8128@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            So basically, it’s not about the topic, but about how it’s framed? That kinda proves my point—tech stuff is allowed as long as it’s phrased vaguely or conversationally enough. Which is fine, but still makes the space biased toward people who are familiar with those contexts. I’m not saying don’t allow them, I’m just pointing out that this flexibility doesn’t feel equally intuitive to non-tech people, which can unintentionally gatekeep.

            If niche stuff is going to live in general communities anyway, then what’s the point of having dedicated communities at all? Should we just post everything in the same place and hope the phrasing makes it acceptable?

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    No need for that. Have a local server. I don’t use git, it’s useless for what I’m doing, and Subversion is fine.

    • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Owned by Microsoft. Microsoft recently blocked e-mail access to a LibreOffice dev. Speculation is that they’ll start blocking projects for competing products next.

      (Alternative explanation: Gitlab should be part of IT divestment from US-based services.)

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Gitlab itself is American these days, legally speaking.

        Try Forgejo, self hosted or one of the European hosts (some allow private projects)

    • astrsk@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Just use git. It’s what all these front ends use at their core. It’s all just git which doesn’t need any hosting at all. If all you want is tracking changes you don’t even need to set up a remote to push / pull from. Just install git on your local development machine, make a folder for you project, and run ‘git init’. Now you have a local repo which can track and commit changes and you have all of the incredibly powerful tools available that git provides with ample documentation. Wanna back it up? Just backup the folder with any standard backup application like any other folder.

      • axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        aint that just git tho? i upload my code on github as a backup and so others can see it?

      • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        But how often do you need that for your personal projects? I just have a git repo on a server that’s accessible by ssh. I only use a web frontend when I have to share with other people and then you might as well use a free third party service.

        • justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          You don’t need it on a server even. For simple versioning just use a local git repo without any bells and stuff

          • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            True, I used the remote to access the code from other machines and/or as a remote backup. If you don’t need that, there’s no need for a server.

          • 404@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            One of the most useful features is rolling back from origin when you’ve borked your local repo (not that I ever have…)

            • justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I’m not that accustomed with it myself, so my question: how can you bork your local repo so you can’t roll back? Did you tinker in the .git folder? xD

              • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                I’ve had colleagues who’d panic when they had merge conflicts, then fuck something up, remove the whole dir and create a new clone. If you’re competent I don’t think it should be necessary.

  • tiita@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Need to save them within porn jpg.

    That way, when mandatory face recognition for age verification comes into play, I will know who you all are! Har har har!

    • 6nk06@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I would love a subscription to Codeberg to be able to store private projects though. Codeberg is nice but you need an alternative for those special projects and it’s annoying.

      • justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        If you work alone you can just use git local without a remote repo. Otherwise there is always self hosting forgejo (the software behind Codeberg). But I also expect there to be other hosting services for that purpose.

        • 6nk06@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          You can but it’s for specific stuff, not real projects. Everything should be open source and public by default.

          I would gladly pay them to host private projects.

  • jimjam5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s a small thing but I appreciate how you didn’t use the image of the rapper of the original meme who seems like an overall terrible person.

      • jimjam5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah I don’t get how he was taken so seriously for so long by so many. I get that not every rapper needs to come from a broken and messed up background, but his verses don’t hit that hard due to all the inauthenticity, as if he did grow up on hard streets lol.