• Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    They already used the crew as cannon fodder in Ukraine. A ship without a crew is bsically worthless.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      I mean, on one hand, yes; on the other hand, if the ship wasn’t already in massive disrepair, it would be much cheaper to train even an entire crew than scrap the ship.

  • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Been in repairs since 2018, and they already know they can’t defend it from attacks so it’s likely not worth anything to keep investing into it.

    It was built in what is now Ukraine, and even the shipyard shut down back in 2021.

    Anyone with advanced hypersonic missiles may very well be able to take carriers out of commission fairly easily now. China claims they can possibly strip them of their outer coatings with a laser and maybe get them out of the air, but thr U.S. has played it close to the chest as far as I know and not given any info on their resources of taking them down, they just say you can’t.

    • sepi@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      What is now Ukraine also used to be Ukraine when the boat was built. It was the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, one of many republics in the Soviet Union of Socialist Republics.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It would cost around $800 million to make 40 of them. If someone shot 2 a piece at each of our aircraft carriers…

        New Carriers are around $120 billion before operation costs. So that’s $2.4 trillion is losses off a maybe $2 billion dollar investment by whichever country.

        I’d say aircraft carriers are a dying breed