• opavader@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 hour ago

    before that we also need to make sure superpac backed trash don’t get past the primaries.

    trump got elected twice because dnc has become infested by shills like pelosi and schumer while sabotaging progressives like bernie and aoc.

    pelosi will happily support ice and any anti-working class initiative as long she gets her cut. schumer is an israeli agent who would support brining back slavery if it allows idf to murder more children.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      58 minutes ago

      also DNC wouldnt even investigate the eleciton rigging of the machines, 2 times it happened until it was too late, they are totally complicit. yes we know they are going to get called out as rigging the electiona s well.

  • razzazzika@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Can’t Trump just issue an executive order saying there’s no more elections, or that Democrats are a terrorist organization and just like, not let any democrats win at all? Judges can’t stop his executive orders anymore… he could just abolish congress at a whim.

  • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Hahahahahahaha

    Not even if the Dems had the vote. I am positive someone would block it for civility reasons.

    The dems can not get out of their own way. See Zohran win in NYC.

    • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The dems can not get out of their own way. See Zohran win in NYC.

      So vote to expand the progressive side of the dem party

      • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 hours ago

        You mean to say our votes can override an organization that argued in court that since its a private service they could just ignore the vote of the people and pick who they wanted?

        The same organization that always manages to organize and attack leftist like Zohran and Bernie but can’t find any footing against Trump?

        Yep. That will work. Just gotta vote harder.

          • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I really really don’t think that will change anything. People been trying to change the democrats for the better part of ten years.

            Name one landmark foundational thing they have done in the last ten years thats really benefited the majority of Americans.

            There isn’t one that isn’t a major concession that undercuts the original proposal.

            • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 hours ago

              You’re right and part of that is people like you not showing up. None voting has had the most votes in all those elections.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      The seats that need to be taken I don’t think are sided towards the Democrats getting enough. States like Alabama have had a Democrat Senator in recent years but for it to flip from a Republican back to a Democrat seems tough with how divided and how far right some states have slid. (Nearly 65% voted for Trump there in 2024).

      Kyle Sweetster may be their best shot of a democrat winning , but it’s a long ways away and who knows what could change. https://www.kyleforalabama.com/

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 hours ago

        In the US? Or as a concept? Because I have a few things happening in my country that are the definition of democracy.

        • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 hours ago

          High likelihood your country is not consequential geopolitically. That or you’re fooled.

          • Lemminary@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Oh, so now democracy doesn’t exist if you’re country is “not consequential geopolitically”? Either it exists or it doesn’t.

            Nice moving the goal post, no wonder I have you at -20 net downvotes organically.

            • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              I’m saying voting for class president isn’t the same as voting for the leader of a sovereign hegemon. Maybe Belgium, for example, has a “democracy” but ultimately Europe is a footstool for the United States. It can act ‘independently’ only as long as it pays tribute to the regional power. This is same for countries in Asia, the Middle East, Eurasia etc What use is your democracy if it functions within a false paradigm? The political equivalent of “playing house”.

              • Lemminary@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 hours ago

                We have a “leader of a sovereignty” with a GDP above Spain and Australia, though?

                It sounds to me like you think not having a perfect democracy gets in the way of having a good one.

                • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  Both Spain and Australia are within the United States sphere of influence and that’s just two countries. There are really only a handful of countries with actual sovereignty. The US, China, Russia, India, Israel and to a far lesser degree Iran and maybe Brazil. Even if all other countries were perfectly functioning democracies they would fall under the influence of one of these hegemons. This means there are things you can’t vote for and more often than not your democracy is only tolerated and often defended by a larger power that is a democracy in name only. You are a mock congress in a civics class. Power always wins out. That’s not a political opinion it’s a fact. Votes have little to no power. Hordes of enraged peasants DO have power which is why they are placated with activities like voting. Artificial agency.

          • rockettaco37@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 hours ago

            You.

            You said democracy isn’t real. I said perhaps, but also that the people of the United States shouldn’t tolerate fascism as it has no place in the modern world.

            Which part aren’t you understanding?

  • cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Turn-out for primaries is minuscule. If you’re in a deep red state that has fully open primaries, you can request a republican primary ballot. I guarantee if you fully look into every primary candidate there will be a reasonable person who is at least open to impeaching or otherwise opposing Trump.

    If it’s a partially-open primary state you will have to switch to independent to vote strategically in primaries.

    If you’re in a deep-red state with closed primaries, it’s worth considering switching affiliations just so you can have some say in who represents you.

    I know it’s like sifting through shit to find an edible kernel of corn, but it’s what has to be done to stop this in deep-red states.

  • glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I am utterly convinced that it won’t matter, but damnit we still have to fucking try.

  • Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I honestly quite afraid they are gonna rig the fuck outta the mid-terms somehow. I realize I have little to no evidence to support that, but doesn’t mean it couldn’t still happen under this regime.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      2024 seemed to be rigged at the top only. That’s how we ended up with so many people voting a straight Democratic ticket, except for HitlerPig at the top, which Dems have been trying to convince us is perfectly normal, which it isn’t.

      Its one thing to rig the vote in one race in seven swing states, it’s another to rig 435 Congressional races around the country. That would be nearly impossible. It would take multiple operatives in every district, and at some point, somebody would squeal.

      The Senate races pose other challenges, although they only really have to identify a handful of close races, and make sure those fall to MAGA.

      The MAGA Nazis can’t afford to let either chamber flip, or the Democrats will have control of investigative committees with subpoena and arrest powers. If that starts, it will end with prison terms for many.

      So I’m convinced that they will “suspend” elections using Martial Law, or the Insurrection Act, or some other legal atrocity.

      • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 hours ago

        people voting a straight Democratic ticket, except for HitlerPig at the top, which Dems have been trying to convince us is perfectly normal, which it isn’t.

        What. The dems saying that’s normal? Where!

        So I’m convinced that they will “suspend” elections using Martial Law, or the Insurrection Act, or some other legal atrocity.

        They’re stupid enough to do it, but I doubt they’ll get all the buy in they’d need.

  • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    “33 Senate Seats are on the ballot”

    LMFAO.

    Let me introduce you to Staggered Elections

    Only Maine’s seat is even winnable, the other ones up for relection in 2026 are all safe Blue or Safe Red states

    Currently its 53-47. Highly doubt that Dems can win 3 in Red States. (Unless we get a White Boi Hillbilly Revolution?)

    The House cannot block juidicial nominations.

    Judicial nominations are not subject to Filibuster.

    So…

    Not to be a pessimist, but…

    Looks like an uphill battle…

    😕

  • rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It’s not enough to just elect Democrats. Ok technically Democrats would have 67 votes in the Senate if they flipped every single Republican seat, which would be just enough to convict. But that’s not happening.

    Instead, there needs to be a movement by anti Trump forces from across the spectrum to primary Republicans and replace them with anti Trump candidates. That effort needs to start now.

    • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Tfw electing Democrats is “not happening” but flipping a cult against it’s demented, corrupt, rapist leader makes way more sense.

  • peregrin5@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    B-but what if I just want to be like 90% of Lemmies and bitch about bOtH sIDeS and how the “Democrats are 98% Hitler” but literally not want do the bare minimum (voting) so that Republicans can win again and I get to keep bitching?

    • ᴍᴜᴛɪʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴᴡᴀᴠᴇ @lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      The both sides bitchers aren’t 90% of Lemmy, not even close. They’ve just got loud mouths. Usually I see downvotes on this type shit and see someone challenging them.

      I think after so many didn’t vote because of both sides genocide, and have seen what they caused, they’ve shut the fuck up a good bit compared to election season. A lot of those were probably ops anyway.

  • Phegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    We’ve been doing this shit for a decade now. It’s not working, the system is broken, we should try something else. Yelling VOTED HARDER has failed.

    Also, don’t put status quo Democrats on those ballots, especially ones who voted to table impeachment earlier this week.

  • BubbaGumpsBackLumps@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Ah yes, impeach the already twice impeached, 34 time convicted felon

    These cunts don’t care about law so stop taking the high road, when they go low, kick them in the fucking teeth

    • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Well with a bulletproof majority we could do that.

      Not counting fucking piece of shit Sinemas/Manchins. Actual Democratic leaders. People younger than 65 who want to break this fascist headlock.

  • wpb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Which party do I vote for to get him impeached? Democrats just overwhelmingly struck down a motion to impeach.

      • wpb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        So just ignore what’s going on right now? That’s like saying I should vote republican if I care about black rights because they abolished slavery.

          • wpb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            Could you help me out with that? Between this, the Laken Riley act, the support of the bombing of Iran, the support of the genocide, and the opposition to Zohran, the dems look like they quite like Trump, so I guess I just don’t understand. Or should we buckle up for more performative whine ins like Corey Booker did?