If I were forced to choose between two choices and I didn’t like either, I would not consider myself living in a democracy. Democracy is pointless if you aren’t able to vote for a candidate that you actually like.
The solution is reform. If your democracy is not proportional, then it is not a democracy.
A comprehensive look at voter turnout from 2000 onwards reveals that the average turnout rate for primary elections is 27% of registered voters, compared to 60.5% for general elections. It should be noted that less than half of the voters who cast a ballot in the general election participate in primaries.
If I were forced to choose between two choices and I didn’t like either, I would not consider myself living in a democracy. Democracy is pointless if you aren’t able to vote for a candidate that you actually like.
The solution is reform. If your democracy is not proportional, then it is not a democracy.
Then it’s not a democracy. But you still live here.
You are able to do that, it’s the entire point of a primary.
It’s not the best system, certainly, but it does mean you actually get more than 2 choices.
Sort of?
https://goodparty.org/blog/article/primary-vs-general-election
All sorts of problems have solutions. I see this a lot in the tech space, like the need to save a video, Adblock, whatever.
…But generally, people don’t use them. Or know about them.
US primaries feel similar, where voters technically have the ability to choose candidates but, statistically, they don’t.
Attention is finite. Many dont know about primaries. To me, giving people the choice doesn’t matter if it’s obscure and inaccessibly designed.
Voters: refuse to vote in primary
Also Voters: “Why are the nominees so terrible?”