• YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m taking a somewhat oppositional position to OP! I’m not gatekeeping anything, just expanding on the topic. And no, I personally have never collected anything nor do I particularly care for decoration, and I find being attached to material possessions to that extent says something not necessarily dangerous or immoral about you, but it does still. So, while being obsessed with toys is not at the core of any ideological or personality-dependent negative attribute (nor does it constitute one by itself), it does serve as a litmus test for whether the person is, you know, ‘regular’. Come on, you go to a guy’s house and he has nothing but Goku and Vegeta inflatable dolls and refuses to take off the Piccolo doorag in his 30s and you’re not gonna think he might be a tad infantile and focused on less than important things?

    • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      and you’re not gonna think he might be a tad infantile

      The question is: why should I?

      I don’t believe you’re more mature because you have fewer doorags, dude.

      I do believe someone having this much contempt for keeping art in their house is a little weird.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Oh god, you’re dealing with this idiot, too? They’re the whole reason we have the saying “nothing before the ‘but’ matters” and it’s just so disappointing that they think they’re being a good person.