• justastranger@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      No but there’s no law against expelling a state from the union. Kind of a reverse secession if you can piss trump off enough for him to actually do it (no law saying that only Congress can expel them, so it would go to the courts).

    • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

      The Constitution of the US of frickin A

        • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The preamble is part of the Constitution.

          As to being a legal document, it’s not only a legal document (which the supreme Court uses as the final legal authority), but

          The Constitution of the United States of America is the foundational legal document of the U.S. federal system.

          https://www.britannica.com/topic/Constitution-of-the-United-States-of-America

          The fact that I am being downloaded and you are being upvoted says something about why we’re having so much difficulty combating this administration’s excesses.

          You are slightly wrong in every point.

          • _stranger_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            The preamble to the Constitution is NOT the same as the preamble to the declaration of Independence. They were completely separate documents written more than a decade apart.

            in fact:

            The Declaration was rarely mentioned during the debates about the United States Constitution, and its language was not incorporated into that document.[44]: 92  George Mason’s draft of the Virginia Declaration of Rights was more influential, and its language was echoed in state constitutions and state bills of rights more often than Jefferson’s words.[44]: 90 [21]: 165–167  “In none of these documents”, wrote Pauline Maier, “is there any evidence whatsoever that the Declaration of Independence lived in men’s minds as a classic statement of American political principles.”[21]: 167

  • mat dave@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t support it, only because my state wouldn’t be seperating to join the “good” side

  • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Washingtonian here, I’ve been saying this should happen for like 8 years now lmao

    The marriage isn’t working. Let it go.

    • wolfinthewoods@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      We have had a name for it for awhile, my fellow Washingtonians call the Washington/Oregon/California union ‘Cascadia’. Wouldn’t be such a bad idea.

      • invertedspear@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you don’t take AZ and NV with you, you will get your Colorado River water cut off and lose a lot of farming power. That might even require UT. Unless it’s only Northern California included, in which case you still lose that agriculture, and possible land based trade lines to Mexico. It’s not a clean and pretty separation.

      • -☆-@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fuck yeah! Cascadia! Let us stop funding this awful government and actually put our taxes towards improving people’s lives

      • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Absolutely, and I’m about ready to start identifying as that over American 🫠.

        I usually think of BC being part of it, too, cause we’re so similar culturally, and we hang out on each other’s side of the made up invisible line all the time.

        One can dream!

  • Fleur_@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The first step is refering to yourself as a member of your state and not an American I guess

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Coloradan. Only if a neighboring State does, because if not, we are neighboring other borders and we would be landlocked without food or water imports. Its either all Pacific and Front Range States agree we have to split, or none of us can.

    Our most populous cities, Denver and CO Springs, are below the mountains, and are screwed in a combat scenario.

    I don’t see Utah, Wyoming, Nevada, or Kansas doing so willingly.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      In American balkanization I imagine yall would be a battleground of the literal variety. Colorado and new Mexico would want to join Pacifica and Nevada, Arizona, Wyoming, and Montana likely won’t. But also you’re valuable enough to justify putting up a stink for

  • VampirePenguin@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    No. We’d be overrun by federal troops and decimated within a week. If we could secede peacefully? We (Wisconsin) would probably need an alliance with Minnesota and Michigan to survive.

  • Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Californian. No.

    It wouldn’t solve any problems that can’t be solved by other means, and it would create new problems that we haven’t had to worry about before. It’d be a net loss for everyone involved.

    • quetzaldilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      We’d have to spend a fortune on defense.

      We’d suffer massive losses from being cut off from interstate trade agreements.

      We’d have to deal with massive immigration issues.

      We’d probably get our shit pushed in from all the federal military bases within the state.

      I think it’s waaaay easier to just oust the current leadership and remove all the Congress members that aided and abetted.