You must log in or register to comment.
Ehh…Not that it’s entirely applicable to this case, using royal titles as positive complements to people still seems like a nice way to keep such titles positive in peoples’ minds. Which is bad.
Like the whole fad of calling people “kings” for having an agreeable opinion. Extremely lame.
The juxtaposition of “no kings” but then using queen in a positive light in the same sentence is hilariously hypocritical on a linguistic level.
“Queens” has other meanings now which muddy the 1:1 comparison you’re trying to make.
Imo, this may feel questionable in 20 years, but it feels like a win right now so let’s take it
if a protest is sanctioned by tge state, it means it has been contained.
Fuck yeah, let’s go Boston!
Home of the tea party
Ok so no tea and no king in Boston
You know, you could just ban British people altogether. It would be easier
Boston is the “Balls”. We may need to fight another revolution very soon.
I’ll be very honored to be 2025’s version of the modern Minutemen.
I swear to God, if your name is Preston, I’m gonna punch you in the face and then join the ranks.
Count me in!
I’d be happy to join you and go full Milbury on a Nazi with a steel toed boot
Hold the line!
Kings 👎
Queens 👍
Is it a tea party?
That’s beautiful … stay safe out there … we’re cheering for you all
