• philpo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah,I am not sure if there is a safety interlock with Boeing RATs(and the video is really bad)…so it might be intentional.

    It’s strange. Personally I currently go with water in the fuel system as the “most likely guess by a armchair pilot”(me),but wouldn’t also be surprised being it an electronic error. When that would be the case Boeing would be fucked beyond repair,imho.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Something wrong with the fuel system was my initial armchair guess, but I’m not so sure based off the second vid. One would expect to see some yaw or rolling in an underpowered or lost of power take off with a jet.

      Guess we’ll have to wait until someone more qualified explains it.

    • torrentialgrain@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Dude the plane is 13 years old. If there was a mechanical problem with the plane its on Air India, and I say that as a certified Airbus fanboy.

        • torrentialgrain@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Why are you idiots even putting me in the position of defending Boeing lmao. Yes I’m aware of all the problems the Dreamliner had, alleged and in practical use. But none of them can explain what happened to the Air India flight.

          The problems Barnett brought to attention don’t give you a double engine rollback immediately after rotation.

      • philpo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        No. Faults often don’t get detected early,need certain circumstances (swiss cheese model) or quite simply, are caused by replacement parts. There is a long chain of things that could fall into Boeing responsibility - and even if it doesn’t the market does not always react reasonably.

        • torrentialgrain@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          We will see I suppose. Your last sentence is most certainly true in any case but I will stand by the fact that after 13 years a mechanical problem will much more likely be due to bad maintenance- especially given AIs difficult track record in that regard.

          • philpo@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yeah, absolutely, AI has issues- that’s why I narrowed my “Boeings fa**ult” down to electronics/software. There isn’t too much maintenance they can fuck up in that department that can kill both engines(afaik). In other parts like fuel,fuel distribution,etc? Totally different.

            My bet is still on sometimes with the fuel, though. Maybe water in the fuel.

            • torrentialgrain@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              My suspicion is fuel contamination as well. Just terrible all around. Hope we get some facts from the investigation rather soon.