• Pnut@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    My cousin had his done for like $3000 several years ago. No issues. He actually has surprisingly good vision.

  • HeyListenWatchOut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Had all-laser LASIK done in 2007.

    Was scary, and the excimer laser sounded like a giant electrical wasp, but overall, I’ve had zero problems. Best procedure I’ve ever had done.

    My older sibling had it done back then, too. No issues. 2 other close friends did the same. Not a single issue.

    Give it a rest people.

    Go get checked to see if you’re a valid candidate, and have the procedure done by a professional ophthalmologist with an “all-laser” setup who has more than a decade or so of experience and also has the $200,000 equipment to do it right and a lifetime contract-backed guarantee, and you will be happy with the choice you made.

  • Shanedino@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Risk management isn’t solely based on how bad the outcome is but also on how likely that outcome is.

  • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Wasn’t considering lasik, and now never will after watching final destination 5 (if you know what I’m talking about)

    And I didn’t even watch the actual scene, I had to cover my eyes and skip forward and even the hearing the dialogue before and after made me feel like… Ewwww I hated it.

    Idk why I even watched these movies, I should’ve just read the wiki and noped out.

  • Estradiol Enjoyer @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Bob’s Discount LASIK Barn or whatever it is called down by the Confederate flag monument on the 5 had a big sign for the Nazi “America first” congressman and I feel like I wasn’t about to trust my eyes to them anyway but I especially want to avoid them now, Jesus fuck

  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    also people with damage to thier cornea, like from shingles even if it made a small scar on the sclera, makes in ineligble for lasik.

  • Obi@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I just don’t mind my glasses that much that I want to put myself through this/take the risk/pay the cost. I’ve had them since I was a child, I’m used to them and as far as I know, that’s still what has the least side/adverse effects.

    • nomy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I can think of two specific instances in my life when wearing glasses saved me from serious eye damage, I’m sure there were more.

  • rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I never had it done for two main reasons:

    1. Actual cutting of the cornea.
    2. A cripplingly negative response to anything that surgically impacts my body. Even giving blood triggers an overwhelming need to inject it right back into me.

    Knowing what I do about CC and the astronomically high likelihood of global civilizational collapse before mid-century, I should really have something like that done so I can do without glasses if absolutely necessary. Assuming I live that long, that is. Which, judging from the current advanced age of my own parents, is a decent “likely”.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s only good for 10-15 years before they have to shave more cornea off, best to wait for the last possible moment

      • breecher@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        I had my done over 20 years ago, and only needed glasses again this year (and that is only for a very slight correction, I can see fine without them, while 20 years ago I was basically blind without my glasses). I can’t recommend lasik enough, especially for people with very bad eyesight.

      • taxiiiii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Never knew that it wasn’t permanent. The climate change argument would’ve worked on me. Now I’m even less inclined.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I was a very early adopter, as soon as lasik came out I got it, the radial-k that preceded it couldn’t handle my prescription. It’s regressed over the intervening 30 years, but even now I wear thin light glasses and can at least sort of see without them.

    You know what sold me on this, even though the vision isn’t as good as I could get with hard contacts? My mom had to go back to glasses after wearing contacts for years because the contacts wore away her corneas! At least the glasses I have to wear at this age are only like a -2 prescription, that’s much more comfortable than what they would have been.

    • Lka1988@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      My mom had to go back to glasses after wearing contacts for years because the contacts wore away her corneas!

      That’s a slightly horrifying thought… My wife has keratoconus and has to wear hard contacts (scleral lenses, but functionally the same thing) in order to see at all.

      • RBWells@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah it was unsettling.

        My hope lies with science. Two women at my work had to have cornea replacement and both of them don’t need glasses at all anymore - one is 65 and one is 70.

        And oh yes I was profoundly nearsighted and hard contacts gave me superhuman vision. They are the best correction by far. But I am really hoping that good artificial corneas are available soon.

      • RBWells@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah it was unsettling.

        My hope lies with science. Two women at my work had to have cornea replacement and both of them don’t need glasses at all anymore - one is 65 and one is 70.

        And oh yes I was profoundly nearsighted and hard contacts gave me superhuman vision. They are the best correction by far. But I am really hoping that good artificial corneas are available soon.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Wife got lasik over ten years ago. Vision is great. We live in one of the moist parts of Texas, so dry eyes have never really been an issue. Absolutely none of that other stuff is relevant.

    That said, she’s no longer perpetually wearing a semi-efficient pair of goggles, so when our son tries to grab for her face his fingers go directly into her eyeball rather than being deflected harmlessly away by super-hard transparent glass. Also, completely fucked when it comes to cutting onions.

    I’ll keep my glasses, thank you.

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Surprisingly enough, one reason could be a dull knife that exposes you to more of the irritant.

        The duller the blade, the more it was liable to bend the onion’s skin before cutting. These delays stored elastic energy that built up pressure in the vegetable before ultimately slicing open, resulting in a more explosive release of juice. […] those droplets fragmented while flying through the air to create an even more diffuse mist of all-natural mace.

        Dull knives can be such a nuisance that they even create as much as 40 times as many droplets as a sharper alternative. Meanwhile, faster cutting speeds generated four times as many particles as slower rates.

        a sharp knife and a slow approach will most consistently minimize the undesirable effects of onions.

  • bdjegifjdvw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    One of the best decisions I every made, going from essentially blond without glasses to not needing them. Especially as someone who enjoys a lot of outdoor activities, not being made helpless by a lost or broken pair of glasses is a huge weight off my mind

  • dukeofdummies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I did it because I was blind. Hella blind. -6 and -9. When covid hit I suddenly realized that if supply shortages ever hit hard and I lost my glasses, I was absolutely fucked.

    I could not drive, I could not use two monitors, I would be functionally blind… I always joked I would be dead weight in the apocalypse but in the midst of a hurricane, a wildfire, I could be absolutely fucked. With months before a replacement pair could be acquired. And with all the shit that went wrong with covid… I just wanted to hedge my bets.

      • dukeofdummies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Went perfect. Although I had a friend who went same weekend. It did NOT. Couldn’t peel the first layer of the eye.

        Otherwise I have full 20/20 vision. No side affects.

        It was so WEIRD though. I felt like I was on an assembly line. The process was so fast.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I dunno, after having family get it done, I’m not scared of it, but I’m also not going to get it done until I’m a bit older, and only if it gets covered by Medicaid or something.

    Even then, I’d still need glasses what with presbyopia, but at least I could do without for normal vision and only need reading glasses.

    Assuming it went well.

    But, everyone I know that’s had it ends up needing glasses around the 15 year mark. I wouldn’t even be 70 at that point, and I have no fucking desire to go back to glasses at that age.

    So I doubt I’ll ever get it done.

  • pbjelly@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I got it done cause I was doing archery and my astigmatism meant I had to shift my glasses onto my nose for it. Contacts would have solved the problem but my eyesight was close to 20/20 and was only ruined by my astigmatism so I never bothered getting fitted for them. Plus, I kinda liked buying stlyish frames which I could wear cause my prescription was so light.

    In the end, I had a consultation with a reputable optometrist that rejected a lot of people with thin corneas, dry eyes, and would try to sus out if you’re shopping around for a “yes.” They did not try to minimize the risks and kept reminding me it’s an elective surgery and anything can go wrong in surgery (although, rare).

    The main side effects for me were: a painful, burning sting that lasted for 30 mins after surgery (due to correcting my astigmatism), which a nap cured, some lasting light sensitivity at night (LED headlights feel so bright), and a dryness that went away after a few months. What they don’t say is that you’re still healing for more than a few months after surgery so a lot of side effects can linger and fade away with time, and a few may stick.

    Now if you don’t want LASIK, there is PRK which doesn’t cut anything off but has a more complicated healing post-surgery regiment and your vision is not 20/20 until at minimum a week after surgery. It also has its own problems depending on how you handled post-op.

    In the end, if you realllllly want it and you find a trusted surgeon, and they’ve discussed all risks cause everyone’s eye is different, it’s certainly nice to no longer rely on glasses. But again, absolutely not necessary surgery.

    Either way, if you ever get cataract surgery, it’s practically the same procedure of cutting up your eyes and replacing some lenses. (Also if you get LASIK, keep your records cause you’ll need em for cataracts).

    • SaintNyx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I just want to mention that PRK absolutely cuts something off… It actually cuts the most. LASIK cuts a little, requires very little healing, and leaves flaps from cutting into the eye. PRK cuts off the entire layer and doesn’t leave flaps… It requires way more healing but it’s recommended if you live a very mobile lifestyle like a profession skydive or swimmer etc since the flap could cause issues and mess you up. My husband got PRK in the military because of the “active” lifestyle and the military didn’t (or didn’t at the time) offer LASIK. I’ve been looking to get LASIK and my optometrist actually recommended me ICL. It’s a bit more complicated and expensive however I have very thin cornea layers and the Dr said I was really on the cusp of possibly have permanent dry eyes if I were to get LASIK. Considering it’s my eyeballs that I use to see I’m planning to get ICL because even if it’s more expensive… Eyeballs are important … You know? One other nice thing is in ICL the Dr cuts into the eye and then inserts a permanent lense under a layer of your cornea. So if your eyesight gets worse… They can re-cut… Take out the old lense… And insert one of a stronger prescription without having to cut more and more layers off. Either way my Dr said to wait because I was looking to have kids and the Dr said that having kids can actually permanently change your eyesight. I have an adorable 1yr old now and plan to have just one more… Then I will look to get it done. (Damn adorable kids) Just thought I’d mention that PRK does cut and a little more info for anyone wondering 👍