• Protoknuckles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Because you’re being a pretentious asshole and you yourself do not understand how AI works, nor can you argue against “it isn’t reliable for recipes since it hallucinates”? It’s either that, or you are the only smart person in this thread. Not sure which.

    • ikt@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      it isn’t reliable for recipes since it hallucinates

      This is how it goes:

      • Don’t use AI
      • See memes about AI getting it wrong
      • Believe that AI gets it wrong 100% of the time

      You guys are just as bad as trump supporters

      • Don’t have an EV
      • See memes about EV’s catching on fire
      • Believe that EV’s catch on fire all the time

      8/10

      I’m impressed

      https://youtu.be/Ci-Evf8nQH4?t=934

      Lemmy users:

      Look out you’ll die if you use AI to make some food! Don’t even use it for recommendations or ideas or maybe different things you can try or maybe you want to know a way to do a specific thing or try a slight variant because you might drink battery acid by mistake!!!1

      • Protoknuckles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        What makes you believe I haven’t used AI before? I’m well acquainted with it. But it simply isn’t a reliable or useful tool for what you want to do with it. You want to make lesson plans or debug code with it, it works well as a sounding board. But you cannot reliably use it for information you don’t already have.

      • koper@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        If you prefer instant gratification and “good enough” over robust, verifiable information: be my guest. But it doesn’t make you superior. You are not unique, skilled or brave for using LLMs.

        I think virtually everyone here has played with them. We’ve all seen better and worse outputs. You are not unique, you just care less about truth and accuracy.

        • ikt@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          over robust, verifiable information

          Random websites are robust, verifiable information now are they? How times change

          30 years ago I was told they are unreliable and to use books in the library for research

          20 years ago I was told using WebMD was unreliable, after all it will just say you have cancer laugh out loud! Using the internet for medical information? Crazy!

          I wonder where we’ll be in 20 or 30 years time

          • Agrivar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            Hopefully somewhere less impatient and stupid. Won’t know where your arrogant ass is though, since you’re about to be blocked :-)