And it seems karmacourt will be the first to posit that the fediverse is worth “putting in its place”, going by the upvotes in such an empty community that probably discourages those kinds of suits.

  • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    It’s amazing how Redditors can always find a new reason to make me feel embarrassed that I ever browsed the site

    • CraigOhMyEggoAlt@lemmy.wtfBannedOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I wonder what they’re thinking by mass-upvoting the lawsuit too. Either they’re in the wrong or we’re in the wrong.

          • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            OK… But I feel like when you say “mass up voting“ it implies there are like hundreds if not thousands of people engaging in this discussion. This community probably comprises 50% of the people talking about it. This doesn’t matter at all.

            • CraigOhMyEggoAlt@lemmy.wtfBannedOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Sorry, I was trying to imply that somehow a dead relic of Reddit was able to partially come back to life just to show in all their Redditness that they stand by her.

              • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Dude I don’t know How else to say they clearly don’t give a shit and neither should we. There are like 30 people in the world who are even thinking about this right now and I’m embarrassed to be among them. Just move on

                • CraigOhMyEggoAlt@lemmy.wtfBannedOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  It’s not about “moving on”. It just rang as relevant. I am doing what every other poster here does.

              • flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                The complaint is regarding a known sock puppeter. Those votes are almost certainly all from the same person. And even if not, then those other accounts who write just like her but only because they ‘collaboratively compose their messages’ could be doing the upvoting.

                • CraigOhMyEggoAlt@lemmy.wtfBannedOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I “defended” a lot of people but don’t hold the feelings towards her you posit I do at the moment. I just thought this was worth bringing up in Fedilore. Never did I say the eight upvotes proved anything, just that the upvoters showed there was enthusiasm for it. I’m not reviving anything.

                • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I don’t know who this dude is but there are definitely all kinds of red flags about this post. I don’t know why they assigned so much value to this, so a crusade makes a lot of sense

                  • flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    I love popcorn as much as anybody, so normally I’d launch into a retelling of the whole sordid tale, but the problem with this drama is that it’s not fun to read. Because the CallMeLeni person, and also the one who was leading the crusade against them, can’t write.

                    That’s not like, a cute joke. I’ve never, in my long and storied life, seen people who have such poor writing skills. Many times, people have commented to tell these folks that their writing is unreadable, and every time, the response is either to defend it, or to get weirdly specific about the complaints being made.

                    So instead of bothering with the whole thing, I found the post where I first read CallMeLeni posting something, and I’m linking it here. I didn’t bother carrying over the links they put in the comment. And I’m going to paste a quote, so you can see why I don’t recommend going for it. I can’t warn you enough that this isn’t worth your time.

                    ::: And for extra protection, I’ve spoiler’d it. Read it if you want but you are missing out on nothing.

                    The implication here is false, at least by my definition of the word “false”, and he even alluded to that after it began to be discussed elaborately, albeit before using an appeal to the masses (story of my life) and say “most people seem to understand”, which ignores consensus of me and the aforementioned Blaze (as much as the “the truth we all wanted to speak” remark ignores not everyone had that issue). Notice how I responded with “I can spot rules broken by the other person’s thread more easily than I can spot rules broken by mine” and got only thumbs down for it and no responses, yet when I actually dissected the rules piece by piece in front of him to point out that any rule I supposedly broke wasn’t there, which even the person who recommended I make the discussion in the first place (the aforementioned Blaze) agreed was a “fair point to be honest”, the mod then delved into the concept of “unspoken rules” as an excuse for himself and said he didn’t want to “rules-lawyer”, which not only disproves what he said about “specific posting guidelines” being “in the sidebar” that supposedly explained what I did wrong, but proved a point I commonly mention about people in different places including here always being uncritical and unwilling to see things for themselves and just taking peoples’ word for things (and about that, to respond to Cypher’s last reply, intellectual =/= intelligent). A part of that is it also suggests, by extension, that the quantity of thumbs down you garner is unreliable as consistently meaning anything, unless the rule is actually to apply gladiator logic and say a thumbs down signals mercy, as indicated by the very Roman-esque culture around here. I guess all this time, I was being praised and didn’t realize it? :::