• Hobo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Indiscriminate murder of 600,000 people won’t solve anything. Do you have an actual point or did you just want people around you to know that you have a bloodthirsty power fantasy?

        • syreus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          The rest of the UN could step up and reorganize to eliminate the permeant veto ability. UN contributions should be increased to a %GDP so that we can have a UN peacekeeping force with actual teeth.

        • Hobo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          I don’t have to know what will work in order to know what won’t work. What do you think killing 600,000 people indiscriminately accomplishes? Blowing up a nuke in the US will only make every brown person on the face of the planet suffer and by extension everyone else as well. The retaliation would make the Crusades look like a mild skirmish. Every single right wing evangelical whack job would be voted directly into office. There would be muslim extermination camps created. Not to mention the barbaric notion that killling 600,000 people for vengence is downright evil. What you’re proposing though has extreme consequences that you haven’t even begun to fathom.

          I also don’t think you’ll approach the conversation with any unbias point of view considering you already decided whatever I say won’t work. Maybe I think you should wear a silly hat and ask Congress nicely to quit killing kids? That would be more effective than killing 600,000 people and way less evil.