weird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 14 days agoThe duality of mansub.wetshaving.socialexternal-linkmessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkThe duality of mansub.wetshaving.socialweird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 14 days agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-squarejjjalljs@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkarrow-up0·14 days agoHuh. I guess no one says “monosexual”
minus-squaremoody@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·14 days agoYou don’t need the mono- if there’s only one. It’s just sexual.
minus-squareZwiebel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·14 days agoNo that is ambigous, it could also mean the opposite of asexual (aka allosexual)
minus-squarespankinspinach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·14 days ago“No mono” doesn’t have the same ring to it. Unless you’re indicating that you don’t have mono, in which case, it’s… informative?
Huh. I guess no one says “monosexual”
You don’t need the mono- if there’s only one. It’s just sexual.
No that is ambigous, it could also mean the opposite of asexual (aka allosexual)
“No mono” doesn’t have the same ring to it. Unless you’re indicating that you don’t have mono, in which case, it’s… informative?