• jordanlund@lemmy.world
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    mintpressnews is in no way a legitimate source, you can stop trying to defend them. Failed fact checks, conspiracy theory bullshit, the works.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Or, you know, ACTUAL journalists:

        https://www.minnpost.com/media/2015/11/mystery-mintpress-news/

        "­To date, MintPress’ sole moment in the national/international spotlight was a public relations disaster. It involved a hair­-on-­fire scoop, namely that it was the anti-­Assad rebels who had inflicted chemical weapons on Syrian civilians, not Assad’s military.

        Unfortunately for MintPress, the blockbuster imploded almost immediately. The by­lined reporter, Dale Gavlak, demanded her name be removed from the story. She asserted that it was actually written by an unnamed Syrian colleague and was never verified, which the ​Strib’s Jon Tevlin reported in 2013. (Tevlin also contacted Muhawesh’s father­-in-­law, a local business man/adjunct professor at St. Thomas who denied being the money behind MintPress.)

        Though MintPress could be considered another relatively obscure website with its own particular/peculiar agenda, it has gained a profile in the Twin Cities due to Muhawesh’s energetic self-­promotion. Campuses like Augsburg have brought her in to speak on the question of balance in coverage of the Middle East. A spokeswoman at Augsburg said they knew little more about Muhawesh than that she is the publisher of MintPress, a site sympathetic to Arab issues."

        Failed fact checks, conspiracy theories, “look at meeee!” publicity seeking behavior… They’re a joke of a site, not a news organization.