• Console_Modder@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Rounding pi to 3 is just the engineering way. It’s close enough to get the job done and then I don’t have to worry about decimal places. However, using pi=3 typically undershoots your calculations, so personally I like to use pi=4

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      An error margin of less than 5% (even better, biased in a known direction) is more than good enough for plenty of use cases.

      An error margin of more than 25% on the other hand, is seldom acceptable.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      I finally found you, an engineer actually using π=3 (or 4 as you say), and not just people making fun of it.

      I am also an engineer, but I’m going to wager much more recently graduated (worked 3.5 years).

      Who hurt you?

      Like, I get it, in a world before calculators, but there’s a button on the calculator, in your spreadsheet, in whatever program that approximates pi to many, many, many digits.

      Putting in a design/safety margins into pi seems like a strange choice.

      Sincerely, an engineer looking for answers on this π=3 meme.

      Even if it’s back of the napkin first past approximation. You have a phone calculator. Please use it for our collective peace haha

      (All jibes in jest, I’m genuinely curious)

      • Console_Modder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        Only 7 years of engineering experience and pretty much every time I have used pi, I have rounded it to 3 or 4. Now, the thing is, I am an electrical engineer that works in industrial automation. I never use pi at all