• dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Here’s a litmus test to use when deciding to correct someone’s English online: did you understand what they meant?

    Yes? Leave them alone.

    No? Ask for clarification, then leave them alone.

    • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Not everyone gets offended when they are corrected. When someone corrects my Spanish I presume they are trying to help me rather than put me down.

      • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Assume. Presume implies you have some reason or evidence for that belief.

        Edit: I find it hilarious how many people are downvoting me for correcting somebody who has just said they appreciate corrections.

        • Goretantath@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          If “having a reason” is ok to use it, then good people existing is a pretty good reason, thus you failed at correcting them.

    • TechLich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      A lot of non-native English speakers use online communication to practice and most want to be corrected so they can improve.

      A lot of native English speakers make mistakes accidentally, or speak with a dialect and some of them get really angry when people try to correct them.

      It’s sometimes tricky to know which is which. The best solution is for everyone to just be kind to each other but…

      • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        This is the internet. There’s no room for kindness here!

        /s, but a lot of people do think that way

    • slaacaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think correction is fine, as another comment said it’s a good way to get feedback and learn.

      The problem with this comment for me was the condescension and the rudeness.

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I didn’t read it that way. It’s just blunt, which is a bit rough to some people, but what do you see as condescending? asking because i could almost have made this comment, but probably would not have

        (I am not a good communicator so i really want to understand why you feel it was that way)

        • slaacaa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          This is of course subjective. For me the style of the correction felt like something a strict elementary school teacher would say to a kid.

    • WideEyedStupid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      There are plenty of people, myself included, who prefer to be corrected, because otherwise how will we learn? If nobody corrects us, we’ll keep making the same stupid mistakes.

      If someone doesn’t want to be corrected, they are free to ignore it and to continue doing it wrong.

    • Linktank@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      So you responding to my message to complain about the content, what’s the test for that? You just follow your gut? Or do you have some annoying advice you’d like to give me on when to best give annoying advice?