• TheDoozer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Teaching might have the most reported pedophiles. (Might because there’s no citations)

      This comment below the post about how the Catholic Church will excommunicate those who report pedophiles may be… not as supportive for your argument as you might think.

    • PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah but is there a central leader for for teachers?

      There is for Catholics. They’re all pederasts. Or at least comfortable with pederasts

      • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s not like the pope or the catholic leadership is encouraging pedophiles. They’ve covered things up that happened, but it’s pretty wild to act like it’s some kind of pedo ring.

        • storm@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Covering thins like that up, is encouraging pedophiles. It let’s pedos know that it’s safe for them on the church.

          • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 hours ago

            There is a difference between wanting to deal with things internally without involving authorities, and actively promoting pedophilia. But I’m not here to go to bat for Catholics, I’m just pointing out the difference.

            • storm@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              20 hours ago

              I feel like the distinction starts to get pretty blurry when “dealing with things internally without authorities” mostly just means covering stuff up and protecting predators, but yeah they don’t literally advertise to pedophiles

              • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                12 hours ago

                My only real problem with the narrative in this thread is with distilling the catholic church down to pedophile ring. It’s super reductive, ignoring so much history and the world views of so many decent people in light of a single issue. But just to be clear, I get that it’s a serious issue and they did a very poor job in dealing with it.

        • PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Hahahaha yeah ok.

          Hundreds of millions of dollars spent to silence the countless victims of their systematic abuse but they’re not a pedo ring. lol

          😂

                • Banana@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  18 hours ago

                  Your choice of using the word “promote” is interesting, I would not have chosen it as their intent is to hide it.

                  The catholic church has certainly protected pedophiles for hundreds of years, so that is a function they perform very well.

            • PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Bingo! You described Catholicism!!! And all religions. Actually!!!

              Religion is child abuse. Catholics actually systematically rape the kids too.

                • PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  21 hours ago

                  Not sure if you are just being an edge lord or if you are a moron.

                  /u/OccamsRazer suggest that based on my anti theistic perspective I’m either “pretending to be edgy” or “functionally stupid” but they can’t tell which.

                  The concept of Occam’s razor would suggest that I’m offering an earnest opinion which that user cannot wrap their head around because they lack the faculties required to consider my opinion

                  It’s ironic.

                  A name like that and you can’t even see the simple explanation.

                  TLDR: if you’re struggling to understand what someone says and you try to dismiss it as “garbage” or “idiocy” but unable to figure out which, the simple explanation is your brain isn’t ready for this.

                  • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    20 hours ago

                    Bro the irony… you don’t understand religion but happily assume that it’s about pedophilia. I think you got a hard on for hating religion and have a hard time seeing anything else.

      • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        By straight numbers I’m sure that’s the case, but i doubt its true by percentage. But to be honest I’m not sure if the study included parents.