Election Information

I recommend that you check the links yourself! I’ve copied some of the information below:

Ways to vote

See this page for full details.

Vote on election day (April 28)

Vote by mail

Special Ballots

Remember: Once you apply to vote by special ballot, you can’t change your mind and vote at advance polls or on election day.

See this page for deadlines for when you can apply for one, and when they must receive it by. It also has information on what you must do differently when filling out this ballot: https://www.elections.ca/content2.aspx?section=vote&dir=spe&document=index&lang=e

If you are having any issues, reach out to your local Elections Canada office to know your options.

Data on your district:

Find your riding, your local Elections Canada office, and your candidates by using the search on the homepage: elections.ca

You can also use the detailed search at: elections.ca/scripts/vis/FindED

    • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I recall in 2015 that when Atlantic Canada went solid red that was enough to show that the Liberals won entirely and the rest was just waiting the night out.

    • hazeydreams@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Kind looks like we’ll need to wait all night based on the initial results coming out of the alantic.

      • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The powers that be decided this election is paper ballots only, so no counting machines to make it go faster.

        I mean I get it, but the results will take longer than normal.

        • hazeydreams@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Honestly for the best, counting machines are potentially vulnerable to foreign interference.

          • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Not really tho. That’s an American thing. Our elections are managed by an independent Elections Canada, not by individual parties. We protect our right to vote pretty well.

            But to avoid any ‘argument’ that the Cons might throw up, Elections Canada decided this would be best.

            • hazeydreams@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Anything that runs source code can be hacked. I’m not talking about elections canada or one of the parties influencing the votes. I’m talking about foreign state sponsored cyber warfare undermining our election.

                • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  If it’s online. The vote counting machines are not.

                  Many times a voting machine in America - not ‘online’ - still was reachable on wifi or bluetooth, and was thus very vulnerable.

                  For more info, talk to the people who secure America’s election, if you can find them after they were fired.

                • hazeydreams@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  You can 100% install hardware back doors. Anyone that says something can’t be hacked has never worked on secure products before. There is always a way in. Being disconnected from a network isn’t always enough.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Quebec and Ontario

      An often noted oddity of the Canadian population is to draw a horizontal line at Windsor Ontario and a vertical line at Huntsville Ontario … everything south and east of that line is 90% of the Canadian population.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Elections Canada website down during peak voting time? Yikes.

      I respect the people at Elections Canada, but not their funding. I’m glad we do not use voting machines but instead still count votes by hand with people watching like a hawk.

  • Warehouse@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    “We denied a Liberal NDP coalition.”
    NDP immediately gains a seat, allowing coalition.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s not even a coalition.

      Coallitons are when the party with the most seats (but not a majority) doesn’t form government because the other parties all work together to form government.

      When the party with the most seats (but not majority) forms government with the help of another party on non confidence votes , it’s just a minority government.

      They just try to scare people with the coalition talk to try and make it seem nefarious, such as when it almost happened to Harper, but it’s a legitimate part of how our government works.

      There was a point while votes were being counted tonight, we could have theoretically had a con+bq coalition government.

      Edit: and even as of right now, the cons+bq+ndp could form a coalition, but I can’t imagine those 3 parties ever working together other than to trigger an election via vote of no confidence.

      • FarFromIt@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not quite true. Coalitions are typically starting with the party with the largest vote count to invite others into coalition talks. If they find willing partners that make up a majority and there are enough commonalities between all the coalition partners they enter into a contract. And each party in the coalition participate in the government with ministers and everything.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        And the BQ wouldn’t form a coalition with the current CPC, they would need to get their house in order and move left a lot for that to happen.

        There was a point where the BQ could have been the only party keeping the Liberals in power though, the NDP and Greens didn’t have enough seats to help them pass a vote, but I just woke up and we’re back to the same situation as before the election… Would be funny if the Liberals get 171 and the Greens also hold the balance of power.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I wonder what May would ask for if the NDP refused to support the Liberals in that situation on something and she was the deciding vote.

      • Warehouse@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well, sure.
        But the point was the timing of the statement. After he said that they prevented a Liberal NDP coalition, the NDP, seconds later, gained a seat, allowing a Liberal NDP coalition of 172 seats, if they chose to do so. If they did a coalition now they would have 175.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I get that, and it was hilarious, but there was never going to be a coalition government which was my main point. He was using the wrong language intentionally.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah. The staying on as leader thing can be put down to the “close loss” speech being written ahead of time. Not sure why he didn’t change that part, though.

    • MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m usually disappointed by the vote compass. Lately it has been putting me between the Liberals and Cons because I am ambivalent about social issues and left leaning on economic issues. If you think it is non of the government’s business which race/gender you are, that is putting you on the right these days.

      • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I got the same result for the same reason.

        I think the parties not releasing their platform until so late makes it incorrect.

        It’s a good idea, but not good this election.

      • saigot@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        There’s a “weight your results” button that let’s you indicate how much you care about each question.

      • Daniel Quinn@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m usually disappointed by the vote compass. Lately it has been putting me between the Liberals and Cons because I am ambivalent about social issues and left leaning on economic issues. If you think it is non of the government’s business which race/gender you are, that is putting you on the right these days.

        They’ve introduced a feature at the end where you can choose to weight your answers, so the social issues you don’t really care about can be weighted 0 and get a more accurate result.

        • MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Ain’t got time for that. I did a few questions and it did change the result dramatically.

  • Pyr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Are the early polling votes from last week not counted already? Because they’ve called the election for liberals already but the total vote count is less than the 7.6 million that voted early…?

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Are the early polling votes from last week not counted already

      In one province they were allowed to start counting those 6 hours before polls closed. In all others, they could start 2 hours before, but it is optional and up to each riding’s returning officer. So some ridings have it, some don’t. CBC made it sound like they don’t even know which ones have and which have not.

      • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yup. At least one riding started counting the early votes 6 hours before the polls closed. Usually it’s about an hour before.

        • n2burns@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I think that was Carleton because they have 91 candidates on the ballot, so they had to get a survival dispensation to start early.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Looks like everything is in and it ended up with Liberals 169 seats, three short of a majority.

    Although jeez, I can’t imagine there isn’t a recount in the riding where the difference was literally 12 votes out of 21,000. Crazy close.

    Either way, I’m guessing the 7 NDP and 1 Green basically become de facto Liberals to create a pseudo majority since at least that way they’ll have some influence and it wouldn’t be in their best interest to topple the government and go through all this again.

    • Reannlegge@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      No pollster will be able to predict a ridding, there is just not enough information collected per ridding.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        True. That’s why I’m looking at aggregators, as well as pollsters. Just in case the one I look at is way off for some reason.