Where would you move to ride out a potential WWIII?

  • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think I already live in one of the places least likely to be involved in WW3

    The countryside of Brazil

    In the previous two World Wars Brazil only got involved because people pressured the president to do so, otherwise we could have just sat the entire thing out.

    Like, life will get shittier here too, but it is VIOLENTLY unlikely that there will be any fighting in our soil or even a draft to send soldiers to the war. (and I aggressively doubt there will be any kind of nuke-related mutually assured destruction shenanigans. The elites don’t benefit from causing the apocalypse)

    • Marte@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Least likely to be involved… Unless Bolsonaro or any other dumbass decides it would be fun to lick Trump’s ass, which is very likely to happen if they arise to power in 2026. I wouldn’t be sure about that least likely remark. Also, there are ways to live in a fascist state even if it is not involved directly in a war - Getúlio Vargas is the name that comes to my mind, only to start

  • Marte@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Everyone saying Latin America has absolutely no clue about what Latin America is, lol. The only place safe from fascism rn is either another planet or being dead.

    • TWB0109@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      As a Costa Rican, I agree. Hell, we even have one of trumps deportation (concentration) camps over here

        • Marte@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          No. Moving elsewhere is a high emotional and financial cost that I will avoid until it is not possible to avoid anymore (also, where in the world is safe of fascism rn?)

  • seeigel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    London. Thanks to the artefacts in the British Museum, nobody will dare to throw bombs there.

  • Smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Depends, are we riding out the rise of fascism or riding out WWIII? Those are two highly different scenarios.

    Either way, a Pacific island sounds nice.

    • frank@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Totally agree, but you really never know where would be insulated from everything

      I mean surely in the 1930s Hawaii felt like an excellent place to be insulated from war…

        • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Hah very different themes I’d say.

          On the Beach is about all the people who thought it’d be a good idea to move to Australia in case all the nukes drop during the Cold War, and then the nukes drop and everyone in the northern hemisphere dies and they survive, but then they realize they’re just waiting for the natural wind patterns to bring all the radiation over to them to kill them too. The only way to win is not to play.

          So similar in that they’re both very dismal.

    • brisk@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You might want to wait until after the May election to see whether Australia is immune to the rise of fascism.

    • Bloomcole@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If the Americans are dumb enough to start a war with China, the Aus vasals are the first to go.
      Better not move to a city then.

      • pappabosley@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        As an Australian, I’m often thinking about whether Russian or mandarin is the best language for me to learn. Definitely more rations for an interpreter

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Where would you move to ride out a potential WWIII?

    Australia. There really is no better place in the event of nuclear war. It’s a continent-island, so easy to defend, it grows and can build just about anything, and being in the southern hemisphere it should be safe from nuclear winter.

    Specifically, a rural property somewhere agricultural. Maybe Queensland or Tasmania.

    If you could move anywhere to minimize the impact on you of the worldwide rise of fascism…

    That’s almost a different question, though. Whichever European country is the most securely democratic. There’s lots of non-war ways fascism can suck aggressively.

    • cute_noker@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Peter Thiel has new Zealand citizenship, so you should be safe there. He would never allow his bunker to get jeopardized

    • Anna@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah it might be safe from nuclear winter but it is Australia it already has 10billion other things that can easily kill you.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            That show would have been way darker if Perry had ever employed the fact he’s a venomous mammal.

            Actually, it was a missed opportunity not to go with a female Perry and have an egg-hatching subplot. Their version of the platypus really didn’t do much.

    • lorty@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I would expect Australia to be important in a conflict with China, so unless you expect it not to happen, it really isn’t that great.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’d expect them to stay out of it at this point, actually. They want to expand into the pacific, and the US and East Asian democracies want to stop them. Meanwhile, Australia also has affinities with now-distinct Europe, isn’t directly in the way of any of that, and depends heavily on China for trade.

        And, even if it did become involved, dealing with a Chinese occupation isn’t going to be as hard as a nuclear winter or the total breakdown of modern civilisation.

    • Person264@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      South America is a better place to go in a nuclear war, Australia is in NATO along with NZ, so it’s a target. Can’t really think of any particular targets in South America.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        They are not in NATO, actually. That requires proximity to the Atlantic. They’re Western though, that’s true. Being in a city could be a bit of a risk.

        In South America or southern Africa you’re going to deal with waves of people trying to expand in from the north. No way of life escapes that unscathed. Not to mention, the projections for food scarcity on other continents aren’t nearly as rosy, if there’s soot in the upper atmosphere, maybe because of the higher population to start with.

        And then there’s poverty as a whole separate dimension of things. Here or in Australia I’m pretty sure the capacity to build things like generators will continue. In the third world there’s absolutely no guarantee.

    • Dalek Thal@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Australian here, we’re in the shit. A good chunk of our rural voters support the LNP (who are doing everything they can to copy Trump). Universal healthcare has been slashed down to an inch of its life, and employment prospects are terrible for most everyone under 50.

      If you’re looking to escape the rise of facism, don’t. Come. Here. We’re lockstepping with the US and unless our upcoming election goes beautifully, we’ll get even worse.

      • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Australian here. I think that’s a pretty negative take.

        Our healthcare is fucking amazing. I have a young family. My wife had a complex pregnancy. The care we received was just amazing. The specialist team was the best of the best. Astonishingly professional and well credentialed. State govt paid for an apartment in Perth for 3 months so we could be near her specialist. We didn’t pay a dime for any of it.

        It’s true that we are sliding to the right, but less so than most other western nations. We are no where near as messed up as the US. Even France, UK, and Germany are much further right than us. We currently have a progressive government who is polling well leading into the election.

        We pretty much have full employment. I’m hiring presently. I interviewed a candidate today who I will need to offer $40 an hour instead of the $28 an hour in the award.

        Things could be better, but our quality of life is dramatically better than the average Americans.

  • lorty@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    While Latin America is, overall, a good choice, it’s important to recognize that the mask off fascism we are seeing from the US will only increase the meddling they already do on their “backyard”, so keep that in mind.

    • The@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Was gonna say that.

      It was pretty safe in the last two world wars.

      • lorty@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        If you weren’t living under one of the US sponsored dictatorships, sure.

          • lorty@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Costa Rica, Panama, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Guatemala, Venezuela, Peru, Chile, Paraguay, Uruguay and Brazil and probably more I’ve failed to remember.

            • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              That’s was after WWII, during WWII Latin America was a “safe” heaven

              • lorty@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                I suppose if your only concern is whether a bomb is going to drop on you, you are correct. But maybe you should consider if being kidnapped, tortured and killed without your family ever knowing what actually happened to you is “safe”

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Latin America. They are not aligned with NATO or Russia/China. And the level of life quality have greatly improved in later years. In fact many migrants feel cheated when coming here because they thought europe was better than it actually is in comparison.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Just click your heels together three times, Dorothy. You’ll find all the fascism you need right in your own backyard!

    • andallthat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The historian Zeev Sternhell has traced the ideological roots of fascism back to the 1880s and in particular to the fin de siècle theme of that time

      (Wikipedia )

      So if you could timetravel back a bit more and see if rebooting fixes this whole thing…