• baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’ve seen a lot of conservative (the American Republican model) Christians but I have also seen what I consider to be “true” Christians, with a strong faith and love for everyone, and part of that faith often involves confronting reality, thinking about solutions to problems, helping the poor and weak. I agree with you that it’s not all black and white. A lot of Christians don’t believe in the literal text of the Bible for its supernatural claims, but instead they read it (and other religious texts, there are a lot of religious people who do some multi-track drifting) for its morals and guiding principles, which can all be interpreted in different ways, and there is a lot of discourse in religious circles about the meaning and morals of texts, about finding ancient wisdom or reinterpreting old texts to better suit modern standards. It can be a very research intensive way of life to be religious and have faith. I’d argue that if you have any principles at all that you stick to, that counts as faith.

    • AoxoMoxoA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I agree. Western Christianity is a perversion of the religion imo. To be fair a large part of biblical text has absolutely nothing to do with the teachings of Christ and that confuses a lot of people. A lot of them seem to be quite contradictory to what he was saying.

      If anyone is into reading interesting books these helped to clarify Christianity for me. I do not consider myself a Christian ( maybe in my next life) but Jesus was a radical cat and what he did at that point in history was revolutionary .

      Leo Tolstoy , The Kingdom Of God Is Within You. This one may turn you into a Vegan Anarchist so watch out

      Swami Sri Yukteswar, The Holy Science

      Tao Te Ching , Lao Tzu …this one has nothing to do with Christianity but helped me understand what God ( the Supreme Being , God Head, Jah, Allah or whatever you want to call the source) was in simple terms. It’s a quick read

      Paramahansa Yogananda, Autobiography of A Yogi.

      • Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        That Tolstoy book sounds interesting, I’ll have to check it out.

        There are versions of the Bible where Big J’s words are written in red text, that’s what I would recommend to people so they focus on the part that matters (for Christians)

    • sfu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well honestly, (since you mention Christians), if they are true, they’d have to say it is the only way. Not because they are bigoted, but because all the various religions disagree. But, that view (that Christianity is the only way) may have been achieved by doing lots of research. I think its kinda foolish to say all the religions are different paths to God if they disagree with each other. Any religious person who says all faiths are valid paths to God, are either fools, or liars. Some of the popes have said that, and that would make them not Christian.

      • Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        You have to accept that religions can be wrong about some things to have the view that they’re all different paths to God.

        Plus everyone should turn a critical eye to their own religion, every holy text and every doctrine has both wheat and chaff.

        • sfu@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          If two faiths flat out contradict each other, they can’t both be right.

          Faith A says that God doesn’t care what you do or believe. Faith B says that God does care what you do and what you believe.

          Both can not be correct. Can they both be paths to God? That’s the thing, because of their statement, they’d have to believe in different Gods. So they would not be on two different paths to the same God. If they were, then God would not be stable, and in the case of faith B, God would be a liar.

          • Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            If you reduce an entire religion down to a single axiom, then sure, they can be entirely contradictory.

            But religions aren’t like that, they are each a thousand different beliefs, rituals, and directives. There are enough similarities in message to see a commonality between them.

            Like you said, it’s all the same path to God, some paths are a bit more meandering than others, and some claim that there are no other paths.

      • baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        I don’t think you need to be so black and white. you can pick and choose what goes into your faith, and still remain 95% christian. I guess to me the label just doesn’t matter very much. also if the Pope claims that to accept all faith is christian, then that is very much what Catholic Christianity is. the Pope also plays a guiding and interpreting role, and you can choose to go with his interpretation or not.