Can we just cut the back and forth and accept AI as another tool and let soulless AI content die off naturally. No one listens to music that’s all autotune after we decided that it was shit. The same will be said for AI.
I will see ai as a tool when it behaves like a tool to help himan creativity and not syphon it to make derivative trash; AI has potential but currebt applications are very dependant on training and mimicking content that was already made.
Why waste my life viewing that with so many great artists and writers out there?
I don’t know any AI artists. Me i gues… I generate a couple… they sucked… but I like the guy anyway.
Places i would deploy AI:
-Foggy background scenes
-Random textures
-custom shadin
I could go on but I’m not a professional artist so there could be already great tools for those use cases. I’m sure I could find a use if I spent more time in the space.
Some people need something to rage and virtue signal against. Those who work in private STEM sectors or took machine learning classes years before the LLM craze already understand the tool is here and are willing to learn to work with it if applicable in their job or daily life.
Those who don’t understand anything and are angry at the how megacorporations got the first iterations of training data through unconsentually scraping their copyright infringed data off the internet, still get to feel good by calling it ‘hyped autocomplete just as bad as NFTs that will never do what a person can’. Its a win-win for everyone.
I can’t design a Minecraft house (art) without having access to Minecraft
I value your discussion on this topic, even if I disagree, but this specific point isnt very good imo
Can we just cut the back and forth and accept AI as another tool and let soulless AI content die off naturally. No one listens to music that’s all autotune after we decided that it was shit. The same will be said for AI.
I will see ai as a tool when it behaves like a tool to help himan creativity and not syphon it to make derivative trash; AI has potential but currebt applications are very dependant on training and mimicking content that was already made. Why waste my life viewing that with so many great artists and writers out there?
It does behave like a tool. Just like every other tool it can be used improperly.
bullshit! By the way who is your favorite AI artist? tell me something good about their work?
I like neuralviz. It’s really funny and has a lot of continuity jokes.
https://youtube.com/@neuralviz
I don’t know any AI artists. Me i gues… I generate a couple… they sucked… but I like the guy anyway.
Places i would deploy AI:
-Foggy background scenes
-Random textures
-custom shadin
I could go on but I’m not a professional artist so there could be already great tools for those use cases. I’m sure I could find a use if I spent more time in the space.
Some people need something to rage and virtue signal against. Those who work in private STEM sectors or took machine learning classes years before the LLM craze already understand the tool is here and are willing to learn to work with it if applicable in their job or daily life.
Those who don’t understand anything and are angry at the how megacorporations got the first iterations of training data through unconsentually scraping their copyright infringed data off the internet, still get to feel good by calling it ‘hyped autocomplete just as bad as NFTs that will never do what a person can’. Its a win-win for everyone.
I think that if you can’t make the art without relying on AI then it isn’t art.
I can’t design a Minecraft house (art) without having access to Minecraft
I value your discussion on this topic, even if I disagree, but this specific point isnt very good imo
Minecraft doesn’t replace the mental processes involved in making the art though
I used to play Minecraft and watch movies at the same time because neither required much mental processes, what did M$ do to MC?!