• BmeBenji@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Careful. Muskrat might read this and think it’s a good idea to try to waste loads of CO2 emissions manufacturing synthetic trees

  • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah, this is a really really neat way of looking at nature that I sometimes thought about. Nature is pretty fucking darn technologically advanced

    • 3laws@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They have JUST a slight time advantage: over 1.1 billion years. And that’s LESS than ¼ of Terra’s age.

  • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yup. To put it another way, we’d be hard-pressed to replicate all of that with our current non-tree-based technology track, at even a fraction of the same efficiency. Chlorophyll is basically a miracle-molecule that makes all that possible, and we have yet to engineer anything like it.

    • Comment105@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d think we could probably engineer similarly insanely capable biotech if we were completely reckless, committed a serious fraction of our resources and people, and had infinite Earths to ruin in the process.

      I’m not sure how GMO’s are handled, but I’m guessing it’s a quite restrictive on the engineering side and somewhat cautious in implementation.

    • 3laws@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      We are likely a few hundred years away from actually synthesizing a close equivalent and if we do, this one most likely is THE molecule for planet Earth. Other molecules may be suited for other stars and other atmospheres, but clearly chlorophyll won the race of the most efficient simplest molecule to best utilize the resources of our planet.

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      actually we have solar panels and electrolysis of water, which produces hydrogen, which you can perceive to be H2, which is H-(CH2)0-H, so it’s the simplest (zeroth) hydrocarbon if you will. Not quite glucose, but it’s something.

      btw i give H2 the name zen-ane (where zen means zero and -ane means it’s an alcane).

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not to make this sound less cool but you forgot to mention the speed.

    That being said, there are some ridiculously fast growing plants on this planet.

  • BossDj@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    “wow, cool. Let’s see how people interact with these magical creatures”

    They are mowed down faster than they can regrow and are replaced with asphalt. Oh.

    • khapyman@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I do live in a bit of a different part of the globe. It is a losing battle here on side of humans. Trees pop up and every year there are less people around.

      I like it here, may it make me a hillbilly on a flat ground or not.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Your part of the globe sounds awesome. I suspect it’s close to my part of the globe.

  • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have to keep reminding myself that effectively our technology is just a loosely-based, extremely primitive, and extremely inefficient mimicry of shit that started happening on its own billions and billions of years ago across the entire universe and perfectly scales from microscopic to galactic levels.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Well, yeah, because we can’t make that yet. If you describe anything in nature we can’t make with technology as technology then it sounds like science fiction. That’s just tautological!

  • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Self-replicating, solar-powered machines with long life cycles that synthesise carbon dioxide and rainwater into oxygen, sturdy building materials and sometimes edible products, while providing shade, cooling and ground stabilisation.

  • mumblerfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think this is a missed trope for solarpunkish scifi: manipulating plants to grow anything. Fabric for clothes growing as bark. Tomatoes with pracetamol in them. Flowers depositing certain minerals it picks up from the ground in them. Stuff like this.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The cotton plant, hemp and flax do grow fabric for clothes, and willow bark contains the active ingredient of Aspirin.
      Flowers (Fabaceae) can even pick up nitrogen from the air and deposit it into the ground where it acts as fertilizer.

      • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        There are even a few textile producing trees, like mulberry, that are even better, because it doesn’t need to be spun and woven. The raw inner bark can be pounded together to form sheets of barkcloth.

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Children of time had a lot of this. One factions technology is mostly based on natural processes. Their most complicated computer systems are ant based if I remember well. Great book.

    • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      A setting I’m working on includes engineered plants for construction. Think a tree that can be shaped like a vine, a grow light box strapped to the leader node, the light box changes angles to get the plant to change direction of new growth, forming the main supports to have the floors built on. They’ve also got effectively artificial mycelium cultivated over entire planets that form internet connections and backup power grid, with fruiting bodies that provide solar energy to the system

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I heard that every five years oak trees produce WAY more acorns so that even if squirrels get them all every year, the fifth year they won’t be able to.

  • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    You actually see this kind of shit in tech bro spheres where they describe some “new groundbreaking invention” using terms like this when it’s something we already have, but they’re version is shittier.

    Adam Something on Youtube has a saddening amount of videos on this sort of shit.

    • Sundray@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I was talking to someone the other day who was really gung-ho about carbon capture technology. I listened patiently, and then asked: “You mean like trees?” Which set him off talking about using genetically modified algae for carbon capture, which is a neat idea, I guess, but the impression I got was that there’s just no money in planting more trees so he wasn’t interested in them.