• snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        They are right that the hive mind is stupid for down voting a post that states they don’t see what the other person sees. I still can’t even tell the screenshot in the post has a yellow tint, but take others words for being able to tell the difference.

          • snooggums@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            20 days ago

            The highlighting is really hard to see without a contrast from the regular background color, and to be honest I never noticed the bright yellow stripe down the side.

    • coldsideofyourpillow@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Because they’re incorrect. The original message has a yellow tint in the background, which is only present for accounts that get mentioned.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        Because they’re incorrect.

        I said:

        That looks like screenshot from any user to me.

        Apparently I’m wrong about what something looks like to me.

        • Zoot@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          Well what you said wasn’t exactly an opinion, it was an incorrect statement. The yellow border indicates that the person who was pinged took the photo.

        • coldsideofyourpillow@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          19 days ago

          I’ve seen your other comments, and it seems like you’re sour over getting downvoted because you weren’t able to notice a subtle difference that’s not easily obvious.

          Personally, I like to be strict with the downvote button. It’s just something I picked up (and miss) from old Reddit: there used to be a strict culture on the site, which would lead to a high influx of relevant quality content.

          In contrast, I saw a post on [email protected] yesterday about the theistic breakdown of the American demographic. It was a cool graph, but not a shitpost; yet it had still gained more upvotes than downvotes.

          Ultimately, I don’t think you should worry about it, as these votes matter even less on Lemmy than they do on Reddit.

          • snooggums@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            19 days ago

            I’ve seen your other comments, and it seems like you’re sour over getting downvoted because you weren’t able to notice a subtle difference that’s not easily obvious.

            No, I am sour because people can’t fucking read and insert what they think I’m saying instead of responding to what I wrote.

              • snooggums@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                19 days ago

                You could have kept your pie hole shut when you saw that there was a response that clarified what I wasn’t seeing.

                • coldsideofyourpillow@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  I did “keep my piehole shut”. I hadn’t replied to your comment. Instead, I replied to a different user.

                  Also, it is pretty apparent that you don’t want to have a respectful discussion. Disengage.