Summary
Donald Trump fired FTC Commissioners Alvaro Bedoya and Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, the agency’s only Democrats, prompting accusations of illegal action.
Both cited Supreme Court precedent protecting FTC commissioners from dismissal without cause. Bedoya warned Trump wants the FTC to serve corporate interests, while Slaughter said the administration fears accountability.
The 1935 Supreme Court ruling bars presidents from removing FTC commissioners arbitrarily.
Critics say the move undermines regulatory independence and eliminates opposition voices that could challenge Trump’s policies favoring major corporations.
Removed by mod
100%!
I’ve been thinking about this a lot recently.
What you say is completely constitutional, but not legal. Laws are only here to maintain control, the constitution is more abstract.
Removed by mod
Honestly, that’s fair. AFAIK the founding fathers were mostly capitalists and they made the rules to protect themselves.
That said, I think in the timeline of human history, we’re converging towards better governance and I think the US constitution is largely a step in the right direction.
But also it’s more abstract and if you look at it, it’s not that bad.
I’m not American thought.
Removed by mod
I’m interested in learning more about your perspective
Removed by mod
Oh I see, you’re just a useless angry person. Carry on.
Removed by mod
The amended version prohibits involuntary servitude except for convicted criminals.
Removed by mod
Laws are bullshit only for some people.
Which makes them bullshit, no?
I think they’re saying that rich people are allowed to break the law.
I agree. It’s just a matter of semantics.
The point is, if you break the law you will get the whole slew of consequences, if they do it they will get jack shit.
I know.
Edit: Oh you’re the op of this comment. I think we’re in agreement
Removed by mod
goddamnit, i start getting hard when i read “rational conclusion” followed by a true statement. you earned my upvote.