AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca to Canada@lemmy.caEnglish · 20 hours agoCanada's affordability divide: How the 1%'s rise left millions behind | Canadians for Tax Fairnesswww.taxfairness.caexternal-linkmessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkCanada's affordability divide: How the 1%'s rise left millions behind | Canadians for Tax Fairnesswww.taxfairness.caAlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca to Canada@lemmy.caEnglish · 20 hours agomessage-square5fedilink
minus-squareAlolanVulpix@lemmy.caOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·19 hours agoPerhaps they don’t support candidates because they seek to remain apolitical?
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·18 hours agoThere is nothing apolitical about the legislative process of tax reform and measuring it’s outcomes.
minus-squarestreetfestival@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-218 hours agoIt might make a difference as to whether a group can obtain status as a charitable organization or not (edit: Not supporting any candidates, that is. I can’t comment on the lack of a Wiki - that seems like it’d be a good thing)
Perhaps they don’t support candidates because they seek to remain apolitical?
There is nothing apolitical about the legislative process of tax reform and measuring it’s outcomes.
They obviously meant nonpartisan.
It might make a difference as to whether a group can obtain status as a charitable organization or not (edit: Not supporting any candidates, that is. I can’t comment on the lack of a Wiki - that seems like it’d be a good thing)