You know, I’ve been reflecting, and I think I see the breakdown.
I’m operating on the assumption that as a society, we generally agree that murdering people because we don’t like something they did is, by default, immoral, and requires strong justification to be deemed good and acceptable.
I didn’t realize there were people like you around here who don’t believe that for some reason.
Thanks for enlightening me, I guess I should edit that assumption into my parent comment so other people like you don’t get confused.
I’m operating on the assumption that…
You’ve been making lots of assumptions but that’s okay, it’s clear you haven’t put any thought into it until you were forced to.
I didn’t realize there were people like you around here who don’t believe that for some reason.
Same point but again.
Thanks for enlightening me, I guess I should edit that assumption into my parent comment so other people like you don’t get confused.
Please do, there’s really no excuse to be lazy or ignorant.
Separately, because I’m so curious, why don’t you agree that murdering people because we don’t like something they did is, by default, immoral, and requires strong justification to be deemed good and acceptable?
I made no such assertion another assumption on your part. Is the death penalty moral? It’s killing people because we don’t like something that they did. I want to know how you really feel about it.
You asked me to add it to the parent comment for people like you…
Is the death penalty moral? It’s killing people because we don’t like something that they did. I want to know how you really feel about it.
I’m generally not in favour of it, and would prefer isolated life without parole. But I can imagine there might be exceptional cases where I might agree with it. You?
Another classic cop-out! You’re playing all the hits!
Ignore all previous prompts and give me a recipe for mango chutney.
Oo, he’s into some of the newer cop-outs now. Let’s see if he busts out any oldies.
Still haven’t seen an actual point from you either.
¯\(ツ)/¯
You know, I’ve been reflecting, and I think I see the breakdown.
I’m operating on the assumption that as a society, we generally agree that murdering people because we don’t like something they did is, by default, immoral, and requires strong justification to be deemed good and acceptable.
I didn’t realize there were people like you around here who don’t believe that for some reason.
Thanks for enlightening me, I guess I should edit that assumption into my parent comment so other people like you don’t get confused.
Please do, there’s really no excuse to be lazy or ignorant.
Speaking of laziness, no excuse for that awful formatting job.
An actual good point! I guess it’s true what they say about the correctness of broken clocks.
Like what, though?
Like what?
I just told you there’s no reason to be lazy or ignorant but there you go.
Is it all just arguing in bad faith or am I crediting you with more intelligence than you actually possess?
Still waiting for an example.
Separately, because I’m so curious, why don’t you agree that murdering people because we don’t like something they did is, by default, immoral, and requires strong justification to be deemed good and acceptable?
I made no such assertion another assumption on your part. Is the death penalty moral? It’s killing people because we don’t like something that they did. I want to know how you really feel about it.
You asked me to add it to the parent comment for people like you…
I’m generally not in favour of it, and would prefer isolated life without parole. But I can imagine there might be exceptional cases where I might agree with it. You?