• Stovetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I’d also add that companies/government offices should not be permitted to pay any employee more than 100x the annual income of their lowest paid employee. If the owners/executives want to further enrich themselves, they must first enrich those whose labor they profit from.

    Include stock incentives in that as well. If executives are offered stock packages in lieu of part of their pay to try to get around this rule, require that proportional offers must also be made to all other employees based on level of income.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I’d also add that companies/government offices should not be permitted to pay any employee more than 100x the annual income of their lowest paid employee.

      Sadly this wouldn’t be difficult to loophole. Today’s corporations would simply create nested contracting companies. As in, top execs would be one company where the lowest paid employee is a highly compensated Executive VP and the highest the CEO. The next step down being Senior VP that reports to that Executive VP would be the highest paid employee in a separate company that is contracted to the first company housing the high execs. Repeat until you get to the person that waters the flowers in the lobby.

      Here’s a visual to show the relationships between these companies and the contract linkage: