• RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Many weren’t intentional though. There was diseases spread initially by livestock that killed many of that 3.6 million.

    Yes, there absolutely were intentional campaigns of genocide but a lot of natives just caught the flu and had zero defense to it. Nobody intentionally gave them the flu because many of these people never saw Europeans.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Measles, syphillis, rubella, mumps, chickenpox even. chickenpox is especially dangerous to adults who never had it.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        You’re not wrong.

        However, it is worth pointing out that the documented “smallpox blankets” stuff happened in the 1700s and 1800s, which was already a century or two after the continent had been greatly depopulated by diseases spread unintentionally.

    • Chris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I guess my sticking point is, does it matter if it was intentional? Contact with Europe destroyed them from both accidents and outright malice. It was still genocide even if it was on accident, imo.