Sure you don’t need to if abuse is the only goal.
It’s a weird boundary to set for abusive language that calls out the conflict between the target’s identity & their support for a person whose policies are hostile to that identity by specifically disparaging to devastating effect that quality of their identity.
Do you know insults aren’t good?
she supports a fascist, she’s an adultular, a narcissist
First, adultular?
Second, that’s exactly what they’re doing & who they’re proudly supporting: restating what they’re shameless about isn’t much of an insult to the subject as it fails to demean & offend.
was on the Kardashians
Do you understand the concept of insult?
They’re unkind.
Sure you don’t need to if abuse is the only goal. It’s a weird boundary to set for abusive language that calls out the conflict between the target’s identity & their support for a person whose policies are hostile to that identity by specifically disparaging to devastating effect that quality of their identity. Do you know insults aren’t good?
First, adultular? Second, that’s exactly what they’re doing & who they’re proudly supporting: restating what they’re shameless about isn’t much of an insult to the subject as it fails to demean & offend.
Do you understand the concept of insult? They’re unkind.