Gollum@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 10 days agoI would do this for just 1.99feddit.orgexternal-linkmessage-square117fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkI would do this for just 1.99feddit.orgGollum@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 10 days agomessage-square117fedilink
minus-squareLostXOR@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 days agoJust wait until webcams start cryptographically signing image frames to ensure their authenticity.
minus-squareAkatsuki Levi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 days agotape, and worst case scenario: a hammer
minus-squareSjmarf@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 days agoPoint webcam at a screen, or maybe a white wall with a projector pointing at it
minus-squareBlooper@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 days agoJoke’s on you - I do this already. Porn and all
minus-squarebrbposting@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 days agoThink Canon tried that years ago with some SLRs - expecting that tech will be the only thing that proves anything someday. Wonder if it’s panning out.
minus-squareMutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 days ago Wonder if it’s panning out. Really depends on the lens.
Just wait until webcams start cryptographically signing image frames to ensure their authenticity.
tape, and worst case scenario: a hammer
Point webcam at a screen, or maybe a white wall with a projector pointing at it
Joke’s on you - I do this already. Porn and all
Think Canon tried that years ago with some SLRs - expecting that tech will be the only thing that proves anything someday. Wonder if it’s panning out.
Really depends on the lens.
Hehehe